I am using the latest version, and have been using it for a month or two now.
"Latest beta build of TextMate is 1324. You are using build 1324."
On 18. Feb 2007, at 17:05, Ulai Beekam wrote:
To be more precise, I just found out it doesn't just happen when I press Cmd-R twice on a short interval. It seems to just happen now and then. But when it happens, if I press Cmd-R it just works fine. :S
What version of TextMate? Try upgrade to cutting edge (preferences ? software update), there previously was a problem with comparing the date stamp of the resulting PDF to the source file.
_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Am 18.02.2007 um 23:09 schrieb Ulai Beekam:
"Latest beta build of TextMate is 1324. You are using build 1324."
No, the last "cutting edge" version is 1360. Try setting "watch for: cutting edge" in prefs -> Software Update.
Matthias
-- Matthias Damm - mad@macpla.net GPG key: http://macpla.net/MatthiasDamm.asc GPG fingerprint: CED3 6074 7F7D 3148 C6F3 DFF2 05FF 3A0B 0D12 4D41 Stoppt die Vorratsdatenspeicherung! - http:// www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
On Feb 18, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Matthias Damm wrote:
Am 18.02.2007 um 23:09 schrieb Ulai Beekam:
"Latest beta build of TextMate is 1324. You are using build 1324."
No, the last "cutting edge" version is 1360. Try setting "watch for: cutting edge" in prefs -> Software Update.
Btw, you might want to start using PDFView (http:// pdfview.sourceforge.net/) instead of TeXniscope. We will soon switch our recommendation in the LaTeX help to refer to that, and we'll deprecate TeXniscope. The only problem with PDFView atm is that it does not do pdfsync properly for projects, i.e. with \include's etc. But the developer has fixed this in a preview release, which hopefully will become an official release soon.
Matthias
Haris
PS: I am starting to wonder, should this "cutting edge" really be called cutting edge? I think it may be putting some people off the idea. Cutting edge is following the subversion repository, the "cutting edge" versions I think are very stable. Am I wrong?
Hi,
On 18 Feb 2007, at 6:00 pm, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
Btw, you might want to start using PDFView (http:// pdfview.sourceforge.net/) instead of TeXniscope. We will soon switch our recommendation in the LaTeX help to refer to that, and we'll deprecate TeXniscope. The only problem with PDFView atm is that it does not do pdfsync properly for projects, i.e. with \include's etc. But the developer has fixed this in a preview release, which hopefully will become an official release soon.
While on the subject of LaTeX viewers, I wonder if it'd be possible to add options to the Typeset & View screen such as 'Display in this Window', 'Open in Preview' and 'Open in PDFView'.
Best, Alex
On Feb 18, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Álex Bueno wrote:
While on the subject of LaTeX viewers, I wonder if it'd be possible to add options to the Typeset & View screen such as 'Display in this Window', 'Open in Preview' and 'Open in PDFView'.
That's an interesting idea, I hadn't thought of that. Currently we use TM_LATEX_VIEWER to guide us, and default to html preview if it is not set. We could have it so that if this variable is not set then the user gets to pick which viewer they want (and with a helpful message that if they want to declare a preferred viewer, then they can set the above variable). Should be easy to do I think, and I kind of like the idea. It offers a new user with reasonable options. Hardest part would probably be figuring out what previewers are installed in the user's system, but I think find_app can do that for us, at least for the standard ones.
Any thoughts from other LaTeX users? Would this be helpful?
Best, Alex
Haris
On 19. Feb 2007, at 00:00, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
PS: I am starting to wonder, should this "cutting edge" really be called cutting edge? I think it may be putting some people off the idea. Cutting edge is following the subversion repository, the "cutting edge" versions I think are very stable. Am I wrong?
Well, currently 1.5 mostly sees maintenance work, i.e. various fixes, so in practice “cutting edge” is where the fixes appear first.
But when it’s time to put out 2.0 builds, cutting edge will regain its meaning.
since 2.0 will be leopard only, will the updater be smart enough to not upgrade me if I'm on a tiger machine?
-dave
On 2/19/07, Allan Odgaard throw-away-1@macromates.com wrote:
On 19. Feb 2007, at 00:00, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
PS: I am starting to wonder, should this "cutting edge" really be called cutting edge? I think it may be putting some people off the idea. Cutting edge is following the subversion repository, the "cutting edge" versions I think are very stable. Am I wrong?
Well, currently 1.5 mostly sees maintenance work, i.e. various fixes, so in practice "cutting edge" is where the fixes appear first.
But when it's time to put out 2.0 builds, cutting edge will regain its meaning.
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
On 19. Feb 2007, at 23:11, Dave Grijalva wrote:
since 2.0 will be leopard only, will the updater be smart enough to not upgrade me if I'm on a tiger machine?
Sure -- TM sends CPU type and OS version to the server, and based on that, the server returns info about which new version is available.
-
Allan Odgaard -
Charilaos Skiadas -
Dave Grijalva -
Jenny Harrison -
Matthias Damm -
Nicolas Weber -
Ulai Beekam -
Álex Bueno