I've been using TextMate for years and I'm productive and happy with it. However, I like to try other editors from time to time to see if I'm missing anything. Recently I spent some time learning Vim and I discovered a few things that I particularly liked.
1) Split windows -- not the kind of split windows you normally get in Mac applications, but the Vim style ones. In Vim you can easily navigate from the keyboard to your different splits and choose what files to display in each. Additionally, you don't have to reach for your mouse to create a split. When you split, Vim divides the space up for you which is what you want most of the time. I found that it is very handy when needing to view more than 1 file at a time, which in my case is most of the time. Closing splits is about as easy as they are to create -- all from the keyboard. Multiple windows isn't really the same thing because they are slow to setup and tear down.
2) Selective multifile grep -- in Vim you can use a regular expression to open a set of files, and then just grep across the open files.
3) Don't need arrow keys -- after years of editing with the mouse; I find it painful to reach for it. It hurts my right shoulder and shoulder blade. It even hurts to have to move my hand down to the arrow keys. However, in Vim it is easy to keep your hands resting on your keyboard with your shoulders relaxed. No reaching for the mouse or arrow keys.
TextMate 1 or 2, is there a way to auto-highlight all occurrences of
selected word?
I was from Windows using EditPlus, when I double-click or Ctrl+W to select
a word, EditPlus is able to automatically highlight all occurrences in a
different background colour, very nice and useful feature.
With TextMate I have to additionally hit Opt+Cmd+F, and highlighting colour
is same as selected word, not eye-catching. I use 'soft' and light
background for selection background but I prefer bright background (eg
yellow) for highlighted words.
Ctr-S not really meets what I need.
Thanks.
--
Sent from my mobile. Ignore the typos unless they're funny.
Is there a way to make * include hidden files in Find All dialog?
Currently I have to use {.*,*} to get the needed result but it's not very convenient to type that every time I do a search.
Another nice little tweak would be to search * instead of using the last glob pattern when you leave the glob field empty. And even better would be to make this default pattern configurable. That way I could've just emptied the glob field when I want to search {.*,*}
Thanks.
Sometimes when I'm working on a project and jump between branches TM suddenly stops scrolling to the current file when I press "Go to current file" (⌃⌘R) even though the file gets selected.
This is happening for a few months already. I usually fix this by restarting TM, but it's not the best workaround since I lose all the undo history.
Am I the only one getting this? Or I'm just the only one getting annoyed by this?
I've used Whitesmith bracing style for *decades*, and had it kinda-sorta working in TM 1.5.x, though not perfectly. Now I've lost those old settings and for the life of me can't figure out how to get it even close in 2.0. There's clearly something fundamental that I'm missing, but I've spent hours on this off and on over the past few months, and I'm guessing that someone who really understands the rules (and regex) better than I, could get me on the right path in short order. I'd definitely appreciate it.
For those (unfortunate souls) who are not familiar with Whitesmith:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style#Whitesmiths_style
Also, just as a general suggestion, it seems like it would be really helpful to have just a handful of "packaged" example indentation rules for the small handful of common bracing styles, i.e. Allman, K&R, Whitesmith, maybe Gnu. Of course it wouldn't be perfect for everyone, but it could be really helpful as a starting point. If you know of such a set of examples, please point me to them (yes, I've looked). Thanks!
Hello,
I absolutely love the feature introduced in TM 2 with Lion: being able
to reopen all the windows [1] after any expected or unexpected events
(rebooting, upgrading, crashes, ...).
What I miss in TextMate though is reopening the windows in the same
desktop where they were before closing the app.
I often have up to 100 files opened at the same time, spread across a
number of desktops and I only reboot the OS about once in a month. But
after every reboot or TM upgrade, I need to sort the windows manually
again which is a bit annoying.
Terminal windows open in exactly the same desktop where they were
closed, the web browser (Chrome) sadly doesn't respect that, about
other software I don't care. I would really love it if TextMate would
remember in which desktop the windows were last opened and reproduce
the exact state after relaunch. I don't know how difficult it would be
to implement that change though.
What do others think about it? Should I enter the feature request in
the tracker?
Thank you,
Mojca
[1] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204005
when I type a quote or a left paren when using the fortran bundle, it automatically inserts a matching quote or paren and leaves the cursor between it and the one i typed myself.
i can see that some users will love this and find it very useful. if just find it annoying and a nuisance. i notice that this “helpful” behavior is not present in Plain Text, but I’d like to use the fotran bundle, just without the automatic addition of matching quotes and parens.
there was nothing obvious in the details of the fortran bundle, so I’m asking for help on how to manage this.
thanks
bill
I recently upgraded to State 15 and am using an older Stata bundle that worked with Stata 14. I am trying to understand how to make Textmate 2 run Stata 15 from within the Stata bundle, but am having trouble figuring it out.
Hello
Just wondering about the likelyhood of getting
https://github.com/textmate/git.tmbundle/pull/36 merged? I have been
running with local delta updates since creating that PR but have recently
run into issues which removing my customisations has fixed, rather than
having to go through and re-update the bundle, if we could get this merged
that would likely solve 80% of my required changes as it's one of my more
frequently used git commands.
Thanks,
George
I think TextMate’s bundle index should include a RuboCop bundle.
Disclaimer: I wrote a RuboCop bundle myself, and there are at least
three more that I know about:
1) https://github.com/mrdougal/textmate2-rubocop
2) https://github.com/goyox86/rubocop-tmbundle
3) https://github.com/fazibear/Rubocop.tmbundle
4) My bundle: https://github.com/noniq/RuboCop.tmbundle
1) and 2) seem stale (last commit in Nov resp. Dec 2014). 3) and 4) are
actively maintained.
One of the differences between 3) and 4) is that 3) supports different
gutter marks for different severities, while 4) only uses a generic
warning mark. On the other hand, 3) seems to only ever work on the
current file, while 4) uses the filebrowser selection (if any, similar
to the Git bundle for example).
In
https://github.com/textmate/ruby.tmbundle/pull/99#issuecomment-296400597
ff. there was discussion if the Ruby’s bundle already existing “Validate
Syntax” command should be changed / extended to use RuboCop (if present)
– this could be an alternative to adding an “official” RuboCop bundle.
Happy to hear your opinions!
Stefan
