Hi,
I've recently switched from Makefile based C++ projects to CMake
based. The Makefile bundle had a very nice compile HTML output were C+
+ errors/warnings were highlighted and clickable.
Is there any similar bundle for CMake for Textmate?
With kindest regards
Jonatan
Hi folks.
I have a problem with "typeset and view" with the latex bundle.
It used to work; now it doesn't. Whenever I 'typeset and view' the display
window doesn't display the pdf. The progress wheel spins indefinitely. I
tried changing the shell variable TM_LATEX_VIEWER to another pdf viewer
('preview') from my previous choice of 'TeXniscope' but that didn't help.
The latex engine is working, because I get the final pdf in my directory, i
just can't see the nice quick preview with cmd-R. Any suggestions?
May it be a problem with Acrobat? The display window, while trying to
perform its fruitless display, shows an Acrobat icon.
Thanks,
Sean
--
----------------------------------------------------
Sean McDaniel
personal: sean.m.mcdaniel(a)gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Since I found this:
http://blog.macromates.com/2006/multi-stroke-key-bindings/
I'm using it a lot, and it is really nicer to type ⌘A than Cmd-A,
when writing all documentation, support mails etc.
I've tried to use those ⌘⇧⌥← when editing some markdown blog
post content, and I was quite surprised that TM displays them heavily
condensed, making them totally unreadable.
I tried with few fixed-width fonts, nothing helps. Is there any way to
cure that?
Cheers,
--
Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :|
Hello,
I'm new to the Python Bundle in TextMate and was wondering how one
would go about formatting the docstrings in Python. The traditional
CTRL-Q did not work correctly. I then opened up the Bundle editor and
added the "string.quoted.double.block.python" to the scope of the
format "Reformat Comment" command in the Source Bundle. Again, this
did not work correctly. I then attempted to create my own command to
reformat comment, but when I read what is passed to the script, I get
the whole damn document, and not the scope.
Thanks in Advance,
- Nithin
As an interesting side note I attempted to copy the Reformat Comment
command and do some alterations to it, but for some reason, this is
not set: ENV["TM_BUNDLE_SUPPORT"]. I wonder why it's set in the Source
Bundle, but not in my own Bundle...
Hi all,
I really having trouble with TM. For some reason TM does not consider
the % sign within LaTeX. This means I get a lot of error messages. If
I comment out some included file (e.g. %\input{history}) TM still
reads the file and sends me errors like:
Latex Error: ./history.tex:6 LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a
missing \item.
The file looks at this point as follows:
% \item parindent durch Option halfparskip entfernt
Why does that happen and so suddenly and how could I resolve it?
Thanks
Christian
Hi,
I'm not sure whether somebody has asked this before, but what is the
current status of Ruby bundle compatibility with 1.9, at least for
execution in TM preview window?
I'm trying to execute simple ruby script with ⌘R:
> #!/usr/local/bin/ruby-1.9
> puts "Ala ma kota".reverse
I get:
> RubyMate r8136 running Ruby r1.9.0 (/usr/local/bin/ruby-1.9) >>>
> test.rb
> :0:in `require': /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/
> Bundles/Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13:
> invalid multibyte char (SyntaxError)
> /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/Bundles/
> Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13: invalid
> multibyte char
> /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/Bundles/
> Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13: syntax error,
> unexpected $end, expecting ')'
> ...ML e.message.sub(/`(\w+)'/, '‘\1’').sub(/ -- /, ' — ')...
> ... ^
> Program exited.
AFAIK 1.9 is getting closer towards stable release, so the final
syntax, and for sure it is much faster than 1.8, so for executing some
simple tasks but time consuming tasks it may be a good alternative to
1.8.
Cheers,
--
Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :|
Greetings,
When I google the two terms "bbedit balance" (without the quotes) and
the resulting search ranks a textmate mailing list post as #1, I start
thinking, "I wonder if Allan is aware of this?"
I checked previous discussions (but only through 2006) to see if
anything had developed in the realm of balancing braces in the way that
"the app formerly known as the mac programmers first choice" did, back
in the day. And by the looks of things, I see only heavyweight solutions
to balance tags, which I believe is way more than I need and possibly
not what I want.
I also think it's undesirable to download an eval copy of "the app
formerly known as the mac programmers first choice" for this feature.
Perhaps my Christmas wish will be:
Oh please,
Oh please,
Deliver command b,
Under the tree.
Cheers!
the nameless popular programmers
On Apr 30, 2008, at 07:00, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Whether this will be implemented any time soon, or ever, is an open
> question, but several months ago we had some good discussions on
> ##textmate about how to make the most incredible indented softwrap
> the world has ever seen.
Is that conversation archived anywhere? I'd be curious to know what
people were attempting and what they were able to achieve.
Hi,
Creating a nomenclature with nomencl needs to invoke MakeIndex with
the following:
makeindex ⟨filename ⟩.nlo -s nomencl.ist -o ⟨filename ⟩.nls
The *.nlo file is successfully created after running LaTeX and I would
like invoke MakeIndex as I do it when compiling the document with LaTeX.
How could I do that?
Thanks in advance,
Christian
On 2008-05-01, at 07:00 , Allan Odgaard wrote:
> I have these notes from Jacob: http://pastie.textmate.org/189818
Thanks for that link, Allan. I thought, perhaps, someone had developed
some additional parameters for something like Markdown already. I like
everything that Jacob sketches out there.
Did anyone write anything that attempts the indented softwrap? (This
question is for the entire list.)
