On 15 Aug 2014, at 18:37, riki wrote:
Please find herewith my custom theme. […]
I do not see any issue here.
I saved your theme and switched to it. Then changed langauge to Fortran — Modern and entered ‘recursive’. This keyword is shown in bold and with a slight color change (rather subtle though).
The rule in my Fortran grammar does btw not include as many keywords as yours. Did you edit the grammar? Did you verify that you get the storage scope (using ⌃⇧P)?
Thanks again Allan for your prompt reply.
Yes there are slight changes on my side in language grammar. But those are just adding something or very minor things. I have not done any fundamental change.
In the following code:
program test_lapack_dstegr use mod_lapack_dstegr implicit none ! .. parameters .. integer, parameter :: dp = selected_real_kind (14) ! .. main variables .. integer :: dim real (kind=dp), dimension (:), allocatable :: diag
I checked scope as you suggested. I got storage modifier scope for 'implicit none' and meta specification for lines which are ahead of implicit none. I am getting colour syntax for implicit, none, integer, parameter, real, dimension but not for allocatable.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:27:34 +0530 "Allan Odgaard" wrote
On 15 Aug 2014, at 18:37, riki wrote:
Please find herewith my custom theme.
[…]
I do not see any issue here.
I saved your theme and switched to it. Then changed langauge to Fortran
— Modern and entered ‘recursive’. This keyword is shown in bold
and with a slight color change (rather subtle though).
The rule in my Fortran grammar does btw not include as many keywords as
yours. Did you edit the grammar? Did you verify that you get the storage
scope (using ⌃⇧P)?
_______________________________________________
textmate mailing list
textmate@lists.macromates.com
-
Allan Odgaard -
riki