1. No problem. TM is really easy and fun to customize and work with
so it's just a pleasure.
2. Yeah, Emacs has powerful features, but is feeling quite
neanderthal in comparison to tools such as TM... I don't know how
much demand there is for these kinds of things, but I know I always
look for a way from Emacs (even though it excels at indentation... :)
3. Yep... I've done that.
4. Sure. I am working with Chicken Scheme and have only really crude
Run and Evaluate. Other Schemes are needed as well.
On 4 feb 2006, at 04.38, Paul Bissex wrote:
I replied on the dev list, but this is probably a more
spot for actual discussion. I'm a total Scheme n00b, happy to see the
1. Cool, thanks!
2. As a presumably experienced Scheme person, do you see much demand
for this sort of thing? From what I can tell most Scheme/Lisp
programmers use integrated environments like DrScheme or Emacs/SLIME.
3. We should probably move ownership of the .scm and .sch extensions
out of the Lisp bundle and into the Scheme bundle.
4. I made a simple "Run" command (mzscheme) -- shall I add it? It's no
Northampton MA USA 01061-0847
For new threads USE THIS: textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
(threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
Mikael Säker <mikael(a)sicher.org>
"Strangers have the best candy."