6 Nov
2011
6 Nov
'11
6:33 p.m.
I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be really great if Textmate 2.0
comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed
with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby
installed with the system.
7 Nov
7 Nov
1:58 a.m.
Maybe I'm naive, but what is wrong with setting ruby via the TM_RUBY variable in
TextMate preferences?
I have mine set to ~/.rvm/bin/ruby and it seems to work fine...
On Nov 7, 2011, at 02:33 , Matthew Johnson wrote:
I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be
really great if Textmate 2.0
comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed
with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby
installed with the system.
_______________________________________________
textmate mailing list
textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
2:01 a.m.
On Nov 6, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be
really great if Textmate 2.0
comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed
with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby
installed with the system.
Including any interpreters in TextMate is outside the scope of the application. Which
languages would be deemed important enough to include? If we included them for all the
languages that TextMate could support it would be a multi-gigabyte application.
3449
days inactive
3450
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexander Rudy -
Matthew Johnson -
Michael Sheets