Hi Niels,

On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Niels Kobschaetzki n.kobschaetzki@googlemail.com wrote:

...

Hi!

For a long time I'm using the auto-completion of the LaTeX-bundle. I have a bib-file with 290 entries and I want to use the auto- completion of the bundle, soon after pressing escape for auto-completion there are 3 ruby-processes in activity monitor to be seen that take up altogether 180% of the processor (dual core ;) ) and no auto-completion happens. What can I do to track down and solve the problem?

Just noticed something different: Using auto-completion once opens one ruby-process that takes up 100%, killing Textmate and using autocompletion after re-opening opens a second one with 100% and so on…

I'm using TM 1.5.7 (1455) with an actual svn-checkout on Mac OS 10.5.2

The first thing to do is open your bib file from BibDesk, and save it from within BibDesk. BibDesk is using a certain fixed format for entries, and our bundle sort of relies on seeing that format (easier parsing).

Next thing to check is the presence of email addresses. You will want to remove the @ signs from them, they confuse the parser.

If that doesn't fix it, and you can send me your bib-file, then please do so and I can have a look at the offending items.

And of course make sure you are running the newest version of the bundle.

Niels

Haris Skiadas Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Hanover College

Hi!

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Charilaos Skiadas cskiadas@gmail.com wrote:

On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:

...

Hi!

For a long time I'm using the auto-completion of the LaTeX-bundle. I have a bib-file with 290 entries and I want to use the auto-completion of the bundle, soon after pressing escape for auto-completion there are 3 ruby-processes in activity monitor to be seen that take up altogether 180% of the processor (dual core ;) ) and no auto-completion happens. What can I do to track down and solve the problem?

I managed to locate Niels' problem. Niels look at line 2661, which looks like:

@article{Hein:1994fk, Annote = {Alternative Quellenangabe (urspr{"u}ngliche), @inproceedings{Hein:1998}, Address = {New York and London}, Author = {Hein, Laura E.}, ...

The Annote field opens up, and its end is not quite clear as it essentially contains a whole other entry. In particular it is that @ in inproceedings that throws the system off. Not sure what the best way to deal with it it however. Niels, for now if you just remove that @ from @inproceedings there, that should do it.

Ok - good to now :) Thx for that

Why is all that stuff in the Annote field? Was that on purpose, or a mistake?

I don't know anymore why I have this original reference in there. The rest is on purpose because it's quotes from the paper I needed once for a paper I had to turn in (where else should I put notes on something if not in the annotation-field of manager for my bibliographies?)

Thanks a lot again for your help :)

Niels