No, not yet... I'm gonna have a look at it though.

On 2 feb 2006, at 23.18, Chris Patti wrote:

On 2/2/06, Mikael Säker mikael@sicher.org wrote:

...

I just checked in a new Scheme language bundle into the svn repository if anyone's interested.

The bundle is really just syntax coloring at the time being. I cannot find a working solution for indentation with what TM currently offers, but maybe someone else can, or we'll get some new nifty feature into the editor someday that allows me to solve the problem.

Anyway, enjoy! And if you haven't ever programmed in Scheme, please do! It's a really elegant and fun.

/M

Excellent! Are there interaction / eval modes like there are for Ruby and the like in TextMate?

-Chris

Chris Patti --- Y!: feoh -- AIM: chrisfeohpatti --- E-Mail: cpatti@gmail.com "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal,well-meaning but without understanding."-- Justice Louis O. Brandeis (Olmstead vs. United States)

---

For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate

-- Mikael Säker mikael@sicher.org http://www.sicher.org

"Strangers have the best candy."

1. No problem. TM is really easy and fun to customize and work with so it's just a pleasure. 2. Yeah, Emacs has powerful features, but is feeling quite neanderthal in comparison to tools such as TM... I don't know how much demand there is for these kinds of things, but I know I always look for a way from Emacs (even though it excels at indentation... :) 3. Yep... I've done that. 4. Sure. I am working with Chicken Scheme and have only really crude Run and Evaluate. Other Schemes are needed as well.

Cheers,

Mikael

On 4 feb 2006, at 04.38, Paul Bissex wrote:

I replied on the dev list, but this is probably a more appropriate spot for actual discussion. I'm a total Scheme n00b, happy to see the bundle. Anyway:

1. Cool, thanks!
2. As a presumably experienced Scheme person, do you see much demand

for this sort of thing? From what I can tell most Scheme/Lisp programmers use integrated environments like DrScheme or Emacs/SLIME. 3. We should probably move ownership of the .scm and .sch extensions out of the Lisp bundle and into the Scheme bundle. 4. I made a simple "Run" command (mzscheme) -- shall I add it? It's no SchemeMate...

thanks,

pb

-- Paul Bissex http://e-scribe.com/news/ Northampton MA USA 01061-0847

---

For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate

-- Mikael Säker mikael@sicher.org http://www.sicher.org

"Strangers have the best candy."