About the linking commands: I modified the template slightly, taking the original input and using it where the title was before, and moving the title into an attribute. Other than that, I think the plan looks great.
This bundle includes the reworked pref files and a yahoo experiment. The experiment loads up a pop up list of 10 results from a category (web, video, news) and links to the item you select. It just gives you a little more flexibility than lucky linking. However, Google's policies do not allow for this kind of thing with their search engine, so I had to work with Yahoo to try it out. It uses Yahoo's API and does no scraping.
On 4. Mar 2007, at 22:04, Brett Terpstra wrote:
About the linking commands: I modified the template slightly, taking the original input and using it where the title was before, and moving the title into an attribute. Other than that, I think the plan looks great.
This bundle includes the reworked pref files and a yahoo experiment. The experiment loads up a pop up list of 10 results from a category (web, video, news) and links to the item you select. It just gives you a little more flexibility than lucky linking. However, Google's policies do not allow for this kind of thing with their search engine, so I had to work with Yahoo to try it out. It uses Yahoo's API and does no scraping.
This looks good!
Now, do we make one bundle with all sorts of link creation stuff, or try to categorize things out in other bundles (like this special Yahoo Services bundle)? I am leaning toward just the single bundle.
We’d move Wrap Selection as Link and the current Google Lucky stuff to that bundle as well (and remove the current specialization of it for Markdown/HTML/«whatever»).
I made the Wrap Selection as Link spot Amazon URLs (and shorten these), so I think we can remove the Shorten Amazon URL from Web Searches, and thus entirely remove that bundle.
There is also your wikipedia stuff, which should be updated to use templates, and then I definitely want all this among the default bundles :)
I'll update the wikipedia stuff, no problem. I agree that all of these should be one bundle. I don't think there's really any question...
Thanks, Brett
On Mar 10, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 4. Mar 2007, at 22:04, Brett Terpstra wrote:
About the linking commands: I modified the template slightly, taking the original input and using it where the title was before, and moving the title into an attribute. Other than that, I think the plan looks great.
This bundle includes the reworked pref files and a yahoo experiment. The experiment loads up a pop up list of 10 results from a category (web, video, news) and links to the item you select. It just gives you a little more flexibility than lucky linking. However, Google's policies do not allow for this kind of thing with their search engine, so I had to work with Yahoo to try it out. It uses Yahoo's API and does no scraping.
This looks good!
Now, do we make one bundle with all sorts of link creation stuff, or try to categorize things out in other bundles (like this special Yahoo Services bundle)? I am leaning toward just the single bundle.
We’d move Wrap Selection as Link and the current Google Lucky stuff to that bundle as well (and remove the current specialization of it for Markdown/HTML/«whatever»).
I made the Wrap Selection as Link spot Amazon URLs (and shorten these), so I think we can remove the Shorten Amazon URL from Web Searches, and thus entirely remove that bundle.
There is also your wikipedia stuff, which should be updated to use templates, and then I definitely want all this among the default bundles :)
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
-
Allan Odgaard -
Brett Terpstra