On 3/29/07, Ollivier Robert roberto+textmate@keltia.freenix.fr wrote:
That's what revision control is all about you know :)
I do the same with RadiantCMS, ruby 1.9 and a bunch of other utilities. My VCS of choice is Mercurial (http://selenic.com/mercurial) but that should not matter much :)
Since you bring it up - what VCS are people using on OS X? Is there anything that integrates nicely with TM?
On 2007-03-29 23:M, Nicholas Cole threw down some bits like this:
On 3/29/07, Ollivier Robert roberto+textmate@keltia.freenix.fr wrote:
That's what revision control is all about you know :)
I do the same with RadiantCMS, ruby 1.9 and a bunch of other utilities. My VCS of choice is Mercurial (http://selenic.com/mercurial) but that should not matter much :)
Since you bring it up - what VCS are people using on OS X? Is there anything that integrates nicely with TM?
At home I use SVN and at work we've got Perforce. I'm not up and running 100% with TM and P4 yet though :(
Dan
On 3/30/07, Nicholas Cole nicholas.cole@gmail.com wrote:
Since you bring it up - what VCS are people using on OS X? Is there anything that integrates nicely with TM?
Of all the VCS I tried, Mercurial is my choice too. I wrote about it a few days ago, so I'll point to the post instead:
http://geekthang.com/nodes/mercurial
I plan to work on the mercurial bundle again soon, BTW. Feedback welcome.
-- FredB
On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Nicholas Cole wrote:
Since you bring it up - what VCS are people using on OS X? Is there anything that integrates nicely with TM?
None of them are really well supported in TM, but I prefer command line anyway...
Subversion probably is the best supported in TM. Perforce works well on OS X, but support in TM is lacking.
Lately I am working on a project with a remote SVN server. I prefer to only submit when the code at least runs, but want finer grained control. So I started using Darcs, as it is easy to use Darcs on the same sources. To bad development on it seems to have stopped. It works pretty well, but has some shortcomings: permissions are ignored, and the repository is easily confused.
Gerd
According to Gerd Knops:
None of them are really well supported in TM, but I prefer command line anyway...
Depends on your meaning of well supported but AFAIS(ee), there are TM modules for Mercurial, SVK, Darcs, and so on.
to only submit when the code at least runs, but want finer grained control. So I started using Darcs, as it is easy to use Darcs on the same sources. To bad development on it seems to have stopped. It
Oh, news to me, thanks. Too bad :-(
Thanks for the pointer towards mercurial. It seems ideal for my needs, at least: not least for the ease with which I can seemingly munge together work done on my laptop and desktop, and the ease of setup.
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:20 PM, Nicholas Cole wrote:
On 3/29/07, Ollivier Robert roberto+textmate@keltia.freenix.fr wrote:
That's what revision control is all about you know :)
I do the same with RadiantCMS, ruby 1.9 and a bunch of other utilities. My VCS of choice is Mercurial (http://selenic.com/mercurial) but that should not matter much :)
Since you bring it up - what VCS are people using on OS X? Is there anything that integrates nicely with TM?
I use SVN for everything. The number 1 reason for this is that my hosting company (dreamhost) creates unlimited http'd svn repos with a quick form. The second reason is that it is the standard chosen by all of the Rails and ruby junk out there that I work with.
I've also messed around with SVK for handling finer grained control. But I have instead moved to a separate stable/trunk repo management system for my large projects and commit very often.
thomas Aylott — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg — sixteenColors