I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be really great if Textmate 2.0 comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby installed with the system.
Maybe I'm naive, but what is wrong with setting ruby via the TM_RUBY variable in TextMate preferences?
I have mine set to ~/.rvm/bin/ruby and it seems to work fine...
On Nov 7, 2011, at 02:33 , Matthew Johnson wrote:
I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be really great if Textmate 2.0 comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby installed with the system.
textmate mailing list textmate@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
On Nov 6, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
I user Textmate for all my Ruby work. It would be really great if Textmate 2.0 comes with Ruby 1.9 instead of using the default 1.8.7 that comes installed with OSX these days. Please consider embedding Ruby 1.9 in Textmate 2!
You could of course provide an option for using that or the version of Ruby installed with the system.
Including any interpreters in TextMate is outside the scope of the application. Which languages would be deemed important enough to include? If we included them for all the languages that TextMate could support it would be a multi-gigabyte application.
-
Alexander Rudy -
Matthew Johnson -
Michael Sheets