Enhancing the Ruby Bundle - TextMate

2 Apr 2006

      I'd personally be very interested. I just started doing a few simple  
but much needed additions to the bundle as well (like folding blocks  
for conditionals, do's etc.), but i'd rather save the time if  
somebody already added the things that are needed. I think the  
current bundle is great in terms of lowest-common denominator, and as  
such it may be that people are opposed to expanding it to the point  
where it becomes a matter of taste and style. But i guess you could  
talk to the maintainer (who?) and see if he might be open to any of  
your additions. In any case, I (and surely others) would love to take  
a look at your enhanced bundle. @everybody, Is there a place where to  
upload alternative bundles?
Sebastian
James Edward Gray II wrote:
...
Hi all.
I use TextMate for Ruby programming all day everyday  
(professionally).  I just recently bought a new computer and am  
slowly migrating everything over.  I wanted to rebuild my TextMate  
snippets and commands in the process, so I could reevaluate what  
I've created, fix minor annoyances I have found in usage, and  
improve on what I have created.
I have a pretty large set of additions in my old Ruby bundle.  I  
have tons of snippets for iterators, testing and common language  
constructs, a few handy commands (like switching { ... } to do ...  
end), and even snippets for many standard libraries (like  
YAML::dump/load and an OptionParser skeleton).
My questions are:

Is there any interest in me providing these additions publicly?

...

Would if be allowed for me to add some or all of this to the

default Ruby bundle?
I figure I'm going to be entering all this again anyway.  It  
doesn't matter to me if it's just for me or for all of us.  I  
didn't know if there is some desire to keep the default bundles  
pretty small or anything though.  Let me know if there's interest  
and, if so, how best to provide it.
Thanks.
James Edward Gray II