The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There is a version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of textMate that seems to support all the bundles.
________________________________ From: textmate-bounces+dru=summitprojects.com@lists.macromates.com [mailto:textmate-bounces+dru=summitprojects.com@lists.macromates.com] On Behalf Of brad tittle Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 7:44 AM To: textmate@lists.macromates.com Subject: [TxMt] Re: textMate 2.0
The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There is a version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of textMate that seems to support all the bundles. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have heard not-so-nice things about "e" (if that's the "PC Version of TextMate" you speak of). I know two people who've tried it, and neither found it terribly usable. Bundle support was shaky at best, and just in general not the experience they wanted. Both have switched to the Mac and are proper TextMate users now.
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Dru Kepple dru@summitprojects.com wrote:
The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There is a version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of textMate that seems to support all the bundles.
I have heard not-so-nice things about "e" (if that's the "PC Version of TextMate" you speak of). I know two people who've tried it, and neither found it terribly usable. Bundle support was shaky at best, and just in general not the experience they wanted. Both have switched to the Mac and are proper TextMate users now.
E-text editor is terribly unstable, and the hoops required to get bundle support wasn't worth it to me.
Closest I've found to matching the Textmate experience on Windows is Sublime Text - but I still spend more time in vim in shell sessions on my windows machine at work.
"hoops required to get bundle support" being "install Cygwin" (as a first step)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Jeremy Amos jeremy@igneramos.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Dru Kepple dru@summitprojects.com wrote:
The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There is a version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of textMate that seems to support all the bundles.
I have heard not-so-nice things about "e" (if that's the "PC Version of TextMate" you speak of). I know two people who've tried it, and neither found it terribly usable. Bundle support was shaky at best, and just in general not the experience they wanted. Both have switched to the Mac and are proper TextMate users now.
E-text editor is terribly unstable, and the hoops required to get bundle support wasn't worth it to me. Closest I've found to matching the Textmate experience on Windows is Sublime Text - but I still spend more time in vim in shell sessions on my windows machine at work.
textmate mailing list textmate@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
-
Adam Vandenberg -
brad tittle -
Dru Kepple -
Jeremy Amos