On 21.02.2012, at 13:00, textmate-request@lists.macromates.com wrote:
On 21/02/2012, at 17.16, Max Lein wrote:
I do understand the usability improvements of showing ? for links.
Great, thanks. I know it's technically not trivial, but it's good to know it's on the »to be fixed« list.
Also, it would help if TextMate would distinguish between files and symbolic links.
What do you mean by this? Maybe what I am saying above, e.g. opening ?dummy? which points to ?real_file? show ?dummy? in the title bar?
Yes, but that means I need to *open* files to distinguish between linked files and files that are »really« in that directory. And if I have opened a bunch of files, I need to activate each tab.
The whole point of marking linked files in the browser is to see at a glance which files are linked and which aren't.
Max
On 21/02/2012, at 19.36, Max Lein wrote:
On 21.02.2012, at 13:00, textmate-request@lists.macromates.com wrote:
On 21/02/2012, at 17.16, Max Lein wrote:
[…] I do understand the usability improvements of showing ? for links.
[…] it's good to know it's on the »to be fixed« list.
Which I didn’t say it was.
Also, it would help if TextMate would distinguish between files and symbolic links.
What do you mean by this? Maybe what I am saying above, e.g. opening ?dummy? which points to ?real_file? show ?dummy? in the title bar?
Yes, but that means I need to *open* files to distinguish between linked files and files that are »really« in that directory. And if I have opened a bunch of files, I need to activate each tab.
The whole point of marking linked files in the browser is to see at a glance which files are linked and which aren't.
I don’t follow this.
Symbolic links are marked with an arrow. What are you asking for here?
-
Allan Odgaard -
Max Lein