I noticed that there's an XHTML bundle in the repository and then there's the HTML bundle included by default. I'm wondering, if there's an XHTML bundle, why does the default HTML bundle use XHTML in its snippets? Can we move that nonsense into the XHTML bundle and let those that want it install it? (Perhaps it should be included by default as well.) Just curious.
Rob
On 27/9/2006, at 16:20, Rob McBroom wrote:
I noticed that there's an XHTML bundle in the repository and then there's the HTML bundle included by default. I'm wondering, if there's an XHTML bundle, why does the default HTML bundle use XHTML in its snippets? [...]
The XHTML bundle is outdated and is a candidate for removal. Michael Sheets is working on a better combined HTML/XHTML grammar which will spot the document type tag and go into XHTML mode only when the type calls for it.
For now I’ll gladly take out all the erroneous backslashes from the HTML snippets.
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
The XHTML bundle is outdated and is a candidate for removal. Michael Sheets is working on a better combined HTML/XHTML grammar which will spot the document type tag and go into XHTML mode only when the type calls for it.
Nifty.
For now I’ll gladly take out all the erroneous backslashes from the HTML snippets.
Thanks. Don't go to too much trouble if it's soon-to-be-fixed by another bundle anyway. I could modify the snippets locally if it really became an issue.
Rob