On 15 Aug 2014, at 19:16, riki wrote:
[…] In the following code:
[…] I checked scope as you suggested. I got storage modifier scope […] but not for allocatable.
The issue is not related to your custom theme but rather the Fortran grammar.
The Fortran - Modern grammar includes Fortran - Punchcard. This grammar has a rule for ‘meta.specification.fortran’. In this rule, a new context is started, and only Punchcard rules are included into that context, this is line 69 in the (Punchcard) grammar which is:
patterns = ( { include = '$self'; } );
If we change this to instead include the Modern grammar then it works:
patterns = ( { include = 'source.fortran.modern'; } );
There are other places where Punchcard includes Modern (it actually includes $self + Modern, but here $self is redundant since Modern includes Punchcard).
I do not know about this Modern vs Punchcard, it seems that if Punchcard is made to include Modern (as it already does) the two grammars should just be combined into a single one, which would make parsing more trapsnarent.
Thanks a lot Allan. Your solution works.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:53:41 +0530 "Allan Odgaard" wrote
On 15 Aug 2014, at 19:16, riki wrote:
[…] In the following code:
[…] I checked scope as you suggested. I got storage modifier scope
[…] but not for allocatable.
The issue is not related to your custom theme but rather the Fortran
grammar.
The Fortran - Modern grammar includes Fortran - Punchcard. This grammar
has a rule for ‘meta.specification.fortran’. In this rule, a new
context is started, and only Punchcard rules are included into that
context, this is line 69 in the (Punchcard) grammar which is:
patterns = ( { include = '$self'; } );
If we change this to instead include the Modern grammar then it works:
patterns = ( { include = 'source.fortran.modern'; } );
There are other places where Punchcard includes Modern (it actually
includes $self + Modern, but here $self is redundant since Modern
includes Punchcard).
I do not know about this Modern vs Punchcard, it seems that if Punchcard
is made to include Modern (as it already does) the two grammars should
just be combined into a single one, which would make parsing more
trapsnarent.
_______________________________________________
textmate mailing list
textmate@lists.macromates.com