19 Jul
2013
19 Jul
'13
4:56 a.m.
Hello kafi,
The fact that not many developers/companies do this doesn't mean open-source softwares can't be commercial. You can actually find many commercial open source softwares if you really want to know.[1]
In fact, GNU embraces this if you 'actually' read it as many people including myself suggest you take a look.
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_open-source_applications
--
Tuan Anh Tran
e: me@tuananh.us (mailto:me@tuananh.us) / t: (+66) 849027417 / w: http://tuananh.org
On Friday, July 19, 2013 at 11:07 AM, kafi wrote:
> Leo Brewin wrote
> > This is getting very silly.
> >
> > 1. I don't know how you can conclude that Limechat is not open source when
> > the license states
> >
> > > LimeChat is copyrighted free software by Satoshi Nakagawa (psychs AT
> > > limechat DOT net). You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
> > > terms of the GPL version 2.
> > >
> >
> >
> > 2. What does Yap mean? And if you have read it why are we having this
> > discussion?
> > 3. Having high standards allows people to insult each other? You must be
> > joking.
> > 4. You created UMPLE, LWJGL, EMMA? Really?
> > 5. So if you are prepared to donate to use Textmate why is this discussion
> > ongoing?
> >
>
>
> 1. Try finding the iOS version of Limechat.
> 2. Read my posts again, maybe then you might get some idea.
> 3. I am not. Im the one who have been targeted and insulted. Read the posts.
> 4. Nope. I contributed. My bad.
> 5. I do not like to be forced to 'donate'. It voids the term 'donation',
> don't you agree?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://textmate.1073791.n5.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-pay-for-the-final-TM-2-li...
> Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com).
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate@lists.macromates.com (mailto:textmate@lists.macromates.com)
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>
>