Hello kafi,

The fact that not many developers/companies do this doesn't mean open-source softwares can't be commercial. You can actually find many commercial open source softwares if you really want to know.[1]

In fact, GNU embraces this if you 'actually' read it as many people including myself suggest you take a look.

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_open-source_applications

-- 
Tuan Anh Tran
e: me@tuananh.us / t: (+66) 849027417 / w: http://tuananh.org

On Friday, July 19, 2013 at 11:07 AM, kafi wrote:

Leo Brewin wrote
This is getting very silly.

1. I don't know how you can conclude that Limechat is not open source when
the license states

LimeChat is copyrighted free software by Satoshi Nakagawa (psychs AT
limechat DOT net). You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GPL version 2.

2. What does Yap mean? And if you have read it why are we having this
discussion?
3. Having high standards allows people to insult each other? You must be
joking.
4. You created UMPLE, LWJGL, EMMA? Really?
5. So if you are prepared to donate to use Textmate why is this discussion
ongoing?

1. Try finding the iOS version of Limechat.
2. Read my posts again, maybe then you might get some idea.
3. I am not. Im the one who have been targeted and insulted. Read the posts.
4. Nope. I contributed. My bad.
5. I do not like to be forced to 'donate'. It voids the term 'donation',
don't you agree?



--
View this message in context: http://textmate.1073791.n5.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-pay-for-the-final-TM-2-license-key-tp26689p26749.html
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
textmate mailing list
textmate@lists.macromates.com
http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate