The jumping movement is known as a saccade. (I knew the cognitive neuroscience class would come in handy one day!) On Jul 7, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 6/7/2006, at 23:58, Ollivier Robert wrote:
[...] Typography generally advise on using serif fonts for plain text and sans serif ones for headings. It is less of an issue for online reading [...]
Reading happens by “jumping” from place to place on the line (I believe there is a technical term for these movements) and the eye will fixate shortly on each location visited (sometimes a regressing will happen.) I.e. it’s not one continuous motion from left to right (as it feels like) but instead “snapshots” of segments of the line.
So my take on this is that the serifs are there as visual cues to help the jumps happen faster (because of less cognitive overhead) and/or help with orientation after each jump, as the serifs make the line more explicit.
For online reading the resolution tends to be too low for the serifs to do their job, and instead they introduce noise [1] making the reading process harder instead of easier -- for larger text this is not the case, but for that the serifs are not useful (so it doesn’t matter what you choose here.)
So I’d say the serif/sans serif advice for text/heading in typography should be reversed for online reading -- the advice (about making them distinct) is btw for aesthetic reasons, as we (people) like contrast, and mixing serif/sans serif gives that clear contrast as opposed to e.g. using another serif font for headings, which would often just give a feel of “there is something wrong with the type when used in the headings” instead of making the headings (more) visually distinct.
I know however that there are actually people who like serif fonts for online reading, so I guess it does to some degree boil down to personal preference.
As for Comic Sans: in addition to not be crafted for optimal reading efficiency (but instead for comic bubbles) “serious people” (like myself :) ) generally associate it with amateurish content, since it’s often the first choice when someone needs to make an invitation or similar look more personal -- so on that ground alone I would stay the hell away from this type ;)
[1] There are some semi-serif fonts specially crafted for online reading which are generally good. The problem is really using types created for print on a monitor, and most of those classic serif fonts are made for print.
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate