On 7/13/07, Robin Houston robin.houston@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/13/07, Alain Matthes alain.matthes@mac.com wrote:
I think the default value of TM_LATEX_ERRLVL is not good because we are not sure of the compilation and we must look at the fic.log in any case
For what it's worth, I strongly agree.
It is bizarre that the default should be to ignore errors; I've never seen another TeX front-end that behaves like this, and I'm struggling to imagine a situation where ignoring an error is the right thing to do.
The default is not to ignore errors. The default is to ignore warnings, and I remember we debated this quite a bit at the time I wrote the script to parse the output from xxxTeX. Looking at the log, I can see that I changed the script to return a 2 if there were warnings, 1 if there were errors and 0 otherwise way back in may 2005.
If you are saying that there are warnings that are really errors, and there is a way to tell that the warning should be really treated as an error, I would be happy to learn about it and adjust the script. Right now I'm just using a series of regexps to try and pull the important stuff from all the output from pdflatex.
Brad
______________________________________________________________________
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate