On 7/13/07, Robin Houston <robin.houston@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Alain Matthes <alain.matthes@mac.com> wrote:
> I think the default value of TM_LATEX_ERRLVL is not good because we are
> not sure of the compilation and we must look at the
fic.log in any case
For what it's worth, I strongly agree.
It is bizarre that the default should be to ignore errors; I've never
seen another TeX front-end that behaves like this, and I'm struggling
to imagine a situation where ignoring an error is the right thing to
do.
The default is not to ignore errors. The default is to ignore warnings, and I remember we debated this quite a bit at the time I wrote the script to parse the output from xxxTeX. Looking at the log, I can see that I changed the script to return a 2 if there were warnings, 1 if there were errors and 0 otherwise way back in may 2005.
If you are saying that there are warnings that are really errors, and there is a way to tell that the warning should be really treated as an error, I would be happy to learn about it and adjust the script.
Right now I'm just using a series of regexps to try and pull the important stuff from all the output from pdflatex.
Brad
______________________________________________________________________
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com
(threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate