1. No problem. TM is really easy and fun to customize and work with so it's just a pleasure. 2. Yeah, Emacs has powerful features, but is feeling quite neanderthal in comparison to tools such as TM... I don't know how much demand there is for these kinds of things, but I know I always look for a way from Emacs (even though it excels at indentation... :) 3. Yep... I've done that. 4. Sure. I am working with Chicken Scheme and have only really crude Run and Evaluate. Other Schemes are needed as well.
Cheers,
Mikael
On 4 feb 2006, at 04.38, Paul Bissex wrote:
I replied on the dev list, but this is probably a more appropriate spot for actual discussion. I'm a total Scheme n00b, happy to see the bundle. Anyway:
- Cool, thanks!
- As a presumably experienced Scheme person, do you see much demand
for this sort of thing? From what I can tell most Scheme/Lisp programmers use integrated environments like DrScheme or Emacs/SLIME. 3. We should probably move ownership of the .scm and .sch extensions out of the Lisp bundle and into the Scheme bundle. 4. I made a simple "Run" command (mzscheme) -- shall I add it? It's no SchemeMate...
thanks,
pb
-- Paul Bissex http://e-scribe.com/news/ Northampton MA USA 01061-0847
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
-- Mikael Säker mikael@sicher.org http://www.sicher.org
"Strangers have the best candy."