Hi,
There seems to be a small problem with registering files in projects. I
created a new file, dragged a folder to the project pane and created a
new 'normal' project folder. In that new folder I created a new file,
which then also shows up in the 'finder' folder. I end up with two
references to the same file in the project drawer and have to remove
either one by hand.
Another small thing is that commands that are run by TextMate are not
killed once I kill TextMate using Force Quit. Not sure whether this is a
problem of TextMate or from how job management works on OS X.
Jeroen.
Hello,
Is there any easy way to get the path of a file if you haven't opened
it in a project window?
Today I had to edit two csv files in different directories with the
same filename, copy parts between files. It got very confusing very
quickly!
Something in the statusbar perhaps, or a tooltip when you rest over the
window title?
Thanks,
Richard
It would be nice if I could specify a per-file-type command. The same
key stroke would run different commands for different file types. For
example, I'd like to run "rake" for Ruby files, "ant" for Java, etc.
Actually, I'd like TextMate to read my mind and figure out if I use
make or Ant for a particular project. Hmm...that gives me an idea for a
script: start at the current directory, looking for a makefile,
Rakefile, or Ant build.xml file. If none is found, look in the parent
directory. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. Execute whichever comes first. I
already have a script that looks for makefiles this way; it shouldn't
be too difficult to modify to look for the three kinds of files.
Here's a really wacky feature request: a way to specify an argument to
the command each time I run it. When I'm developing, sometimes I want
to run "make" then "make set-up-test-data" then "make test", or do
things in a different order.
Thanks for listening.
Jim
--
Jim Menard, jimm(a)io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
"Indeed, an upsettingly large part of academia right now seems to be
working on bringing Java into the 1980s... sigh." -- Avi Bryant
A very handy little feature in jkEdit is the ability to jump to
functions/classes/methods from a dropdown at the top of the page, is
this viable? This along with the split views would keep my programmer
(and I'm sure a lot more JEdit users) VERY happy.
Kind Regards,
Jamie
I think the new tabs are looking nice, the darker colour for deselected tabs
is clearer, (although I did like the blue original ones), but Im not sure
that the truncation of the width at 100 pixels is a good thing, if there is
enough space in the header bar then Id like to see the names in full,
perhaps the names could get truncated when the bar gets full up?
The new tabs would work well with a bar ala BBEdit with function list and
stuff in it, perhaps even the status bar could make its way back up to the
top? (see attached mockup).
Chris
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
Had another go at the tab thing tonight, trying to get it a little more
"aqua"... The result is attached.
Both Allan and myself have pretty much turned down the idea. Whilst I
think they look great, they're a little too small, and the X and dot
don't stand out enough... I'd probably have to start again with a new
(slightly larger) "red ball" (this one was borrowed from OmniWeb).
But these flat crosses are becoming a little bit of a de-facto OSX
standard in one form or another -- most tabbed apps are using them, so
I figure there's no need to rock the boat.
We're also ummming and ahhhhing about coloring the selected tab from
white to something else (like an Aqua blue), but my preference is
definitely white.
For what it's worth (Drew, et al), yes, I'd love to have the selected
tab bleed into the document, but Allan doesn't dig it, and it does have
some issues in regards to the colour of the document (eg Ruby's black)
which are a not exactly simple to work around. One day maybe :)
Justin
With regards to Allans comment about the window splitting, this would
be great as I have a couple of guys who won't move from JEdit because
of this one feature. They are doing PHP, XHTML and CSS.
Keep up the good work, this is turning out to be a cracking little
editor.
On 18 Oct 2004, at 20:30, textmate-request(a)lists.macromates.com wrote:
> Send textmate mailing list submissions to
> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> textmate-request(a)lists.macromates.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> textmate-owner(a)lists.macromates.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of textmate digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Window splitting? (Allan Odgaard)
> 2. Re: Shift Left, Shift Right (jeremy*pinnix)
> 3. Re: Left Padding (Allan Odgaard)
> 4. Leave the tabs as they were (James Hill)
> 5. Show Web Preview... options ( Jos? Campos )
> 6. Re: Re: folding idea (Ivan Pan)
> 7. Re: TM 1.0.1b7: Switching Tabs issues (Allan Odgaard)
> 8. Re: tabs, tabs, tabs (Andrew Green)
> 9. Re: Couple little gnats (Phil Aaronson)
> 10. Re: suggestion: Grouping the commands/snippets (Raena Armitage)
> 11. Re: b7 project drawer visuals (jeremy*pinnix)
>
> From: Allan Odgaard <allan(a)macromates.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:19:49 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>, Ivan Pan
> <ifanpan(a)gmail.com>
> Cc: Subject: Re: [TextMate] Window splitting?
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On 18. Oct 2004, at 16:47, Ivan Pan wrote:
>
>> Just a suggestion. Maybe lay out a roadmap or a check list, so we
>> won't keep nagging you about something that's already in the work.
>
> I have considered that, but I fear that it may actually lead to the
> opposite situation, also I really cannot make any estimates to when
> what will happen -- people should consider, “is this a common editor
> feature?” if the answer is yes, most likely I know about it and
> eventually plan to get around to it ;)
>
> For now there is the feature requests in the wiki -- I do read these,
> but currently do not comment on when what is planned.
>
>> It's already a great text editor and certainly an editor that would
>> make BBEdit worry. Keep up the good work.
>
> That's another reason, don't want to give them too much insight in
> planned features, as some stuff is sort of "new" :)
>
>
> Kind regards Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: jeremy*pinnix <jpinnix(a)pixelgrazer.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:22:50 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] Shift Left, Shift Right
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> Option-Tab for shifting to the right
> Shift-Option-Tab for shifting to the left
>
> On Oct 18, 2004, at 11:05 AM, Michael Gregoire wrote:
>
>> Ok, there is one nagging problem I've been having that no one has
>> seemed to bring up yet. What is the arrow symbol (for Shift Left and
>> Shift Right) equivalent to on my powerbook? I've checked the Mac help
>> and the symbol isn't even listed in it's Special Key guide. I've
>> attached a screenshot of the help page, as you can see it's not
>> there. I've tried every combination of keys that I can think of, but
>> nothing works. I have to resort to choosing it from the menu.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:41740bd42504201718993!
>> <Picture 3.pdf>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:41740bd42504201718993!
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:41740bd42504201718993!
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Allan Odgaard <allan(a)macromates.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:23:57 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] Left Padding
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On 18. Oct 2004, at 16:01, Michael Sheets wrote:
>
>>> There already is 2 pixels?!?
>> Sorry, I meant 2-3 more, not total. If the small padding is so good
>> why is there more on the top? ;)
>
> That's a bug! ;)
>
> Well, I think I initially did 6 pixels on each of the sides, but when
> I added gutter-stuff, I made it 2 pixels between folding-markers and
> end of gutter (and/or line numbers etc.), so I removed some to make it
> symmetrical.
>
> I don't like too much padding, e.g. NSTextView seems to be using 1.5
> times the width of a character or so, and that makes it hard for me to
> see how much stuff is indented.
>
> But I can probably be persuaded to add two more pixels.
>
>
> Kind regards Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: James Hill <jamie(a)soniciq.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:28:19 BST
> To: textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
> Subject: [TextMate] Leave the tabs as they were
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> I thing the tabs should be as they were in the first release. Clean
> and just fine. Too many programs today end up with fancy bevels etc
> all over the place. Keep it clean and lightweight I say.
>
> On 18 Oct 2004, at 19:18, textmate-request(a)lists.macromates.com wrote:
>
>> Send textmate mailing list submissions to
>> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> textmate-request(a)lists.macromates.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> textmate-owner(a)lists.macromates.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of textmate digest..."
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: tabs, tabs, tabs (C J Silverio)
>>
>> From: C J Silverio <ceej(a)spies.com>
>> Date: 18 October 2004 19:08:57 BST
>> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>> Subject: Re: [TextMate] tabs, tabs, tabs
>> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2004, at 6:02 AM, Justin French wrote:
>>> For what it's worth (Drew, et al), yes, I'd love to have the
>>> selected tab bleed into the document, but Allan doesn't dig it, and
>>> it does have some issues in regards to the colour of the document
>>> (eg Ruby's black) which are a not exactly simple to work around.
>>> One day maybe :)
>>
>> You might find something to use in Camino's take:
>> <CaminoSnap001.png>
>>
>> The selected tab bleeds into a stripe that goes across the window,
>> but is still separate from the document display. This helps indicate
>> "this tab is live", but doesn't war with the rendered page.
>>
>> --ceej
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>>
>>
>
> From: jose.campos+tm(a)galacsys.com (José Campos)
> Date: 18 October 2004 16:44:07 BST
> To: textmate(a)lists.macromates.com (TM Users)
> Subject: [TextMate] Show Web Preview... options
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> "Show Web Preview" is very nice but...
>
> + on a computer where PHP is enabled,
> + for files that are located somewhere in the ~/Sites/ folder,
> + instead of opening them as :
> "file:///Users/jo/Sites/path/to/file.php"
> + it would be nicer to open them as :
> "http://127.0.0.1/~jo/Sites/path/to/file.php"
>
> ...so that the PHP code could be fully seen
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> --
> Jo <W:00°04'37" ;
> N:47°15'36">
>
> 1....'....12.....'....24.....'....36.....'....48.....'....60.....'....7
> 2
>
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Pan <ifanpan(a)gmail.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 15:34:56 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] Re: folding idea
> Reply-To: Ivan Pan <ifanpan(a)gmail.com>, TM Users
> <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:51:11 +0100, Chris Jenkins
> <chrisjenkins(a)mac.com> wrote:
>> Here's a screenshot. The vertical lines join identical levels of
>> hierarchy
>> and should always be paired with a set of folding markers in the
>> gutter (I
>> changed the folding icons), perhaps the joining lines could in some
>> way also
>> be clickable? Im not sure about this however, I principally see it as
>> a way
>> of identifying which close bracket belongs to which opening bracket
>> over
>> long pieces of code that cant all fit on screen at a time.
>
> 1. tab icons: more visually intuitive that what we have, though I am
> fine with what we have.
> 2. connector's subbranch: I like the idea to have multiple folding
> markers within the same indentation.
> 3. explicit folding markers: I want to be able to clear some of the
> markers in the gutter by manually setting the marking. I sometimes
> have too many markers together.
>
> ip
>
>
>
>
> From: Allan Odgaard <allan(a)macromates.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:44:00 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] TM 1.0.1b7: Switching Tabs issues
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On 18. Oct 2004, at 12:49, Mats Persson wrote:
>
>> When you switch between tabs (open docs) your window moves to centre
>> the current line where the cursor happens to be. Although I can't
>> swear that this was not the case before, I had not noticed it, but
>> now I do, and it is a bit irritating.
>
> It has always been the case ;) I realize that not all like it, since
> some e.g. scroll w/o moving the caret. It'll be improved down the
> road.
>
>
> Kind regards Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Green <andrew(a)article7.co.uk>
> Date: 18 October 2004 14:32:23 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] tabs, tabs, tabs
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:02:35 +1000, Justin French wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth (Drew, et al), yes, I'd love to have the selected
>> tab bleed into the document, but Allan doesn't dig it, and it does
>> have some issues in regards to the colour of the document (eg Ruby's
>> black) which are a not exactly simple to work around.
>
> I think the reason this seems necessary is the way that the tabs adjoin
> the document area. You'll notice that Safari puts the tabs the other
> way up, so that they adjoin the toolbar instead.
>
> Admittedly, TM doesn't have a toolbar, but I do wonder if the tabs
> would work the other way up anyway, adjoining the window title bar
> rather than the document area. Sadly, no mockup is forthcoming from me
> on this!
>
> It could be a really bad idea, of course. I'm just wondering.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
> --
> ::
> article seven Andrew Green
> automatic internet andrew(a)article7.co.uk | www.article7.co.uk
>
>
>
>
> From: Phil Aaronson <phil(a)hinkty.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 19:53:30 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] Couple little gnats
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2004, at 12:35 AM, Jeroen wrote:
>
>> Phil Aaronson wrote:
>>> Sure, the output is plain text. I'm there. But TextMate doesn't
>>> exist in a vacuum. We all use word processors. Take vim (I'm not a
>>> BBEdit user which may be adding to my confusion here), if I fold
>>> some text in vim, say ':.,.+5 fo' to fold the next 5 lines under the
>>> cursor. Undo ('u') undoes the fold. Its what I've been trained to
>>> expect.
>>
>> You're right, I thought Vim did not put folding on the undo stack,
>> but it does indeed.
>
> For the record, in vim, undo also undoes text selection.
>
>> However, I still don't think it should be put on the undo stack,
>> simply because it doesn't have anything to do with the text itself.
>
> I'm getting that impression :) Not that this is a big deal, but most
> apps I use seem to break it down along command vs. setting line, not
> content vs. representation of content. That said a command vs. setting
> undo is a little more difficult line to walk with TextMate than a lot
> of other apps.
>
>> And word processors != text editors, there's a world of difference
>> between them.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Raena Armitage <raena(a)raena.net>
> Date: 18 October 2004 16:57:22 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] suggestion: Grouping the commands/snippets
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> On 18 Oct 2004, at 8:28 pm, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>
>> Currently there's no way to group (or drag-sort) the items. But it's
>> something which'll be introduced real soon now! :)
>>
>> Though I'm still not entirely sure how to do it.
>
> Outline view would make the most sense to me as a user.
>
> José Campos adds:
>> Drawers, just like the project drawer would be nice, just add
>> radio-buttons in the tab bar to select which drawer to open
>> (Project-Command-Macros-Snippets-Clipboard history-Templates)
>
> ...that's a lot of things, and I personally wouldn't feel that the
> project area (where documents live) is an appropriate place to also
> find bundly things -- although I wouldn't find it strange to find
> templates there.
>
> Perhaps the contextual menu could accommodate something, though?
> Currently it has 'Filter through Command,' but perhaps some oft-used
> snippets wouldn't go astray here?
>
>
>
>
> From: jeremy*pinnix <jpinnix(a)pixelgrazer.com>
> Date: 18 October 2004 14:26:39 BST
> To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
> Subject: Re: [TextMate] b7 project drawer visuals
> Reply-To: TM Users <textmate(a)lists.macromates.com>
>
>
> I would also prefer they not be bold. The folder icon is sufficient.
>
> On Oct 18, 2004, at 3:24 AM, Johan Sörensen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know I'm being anal about this, but then again I am a mac user, but
>> I'm not really sure I like the bold for the folders in the
>> projectdrawer. They are already plenty visually marked with the
>> standard mac os folder icon, no need to bold up the text, in fact,
>> this is probably the first application where I've seen this (afaik).
>> I'm also not too sure about the file-texts being ~80% black, but that
>> I can live with, it's just the boldness of the folders that's a little
>> too much!
>>
>> If you do want them to be like that, and I'm the only one bothered by
>> it, would it be possible for a way to turn them off? (preferably with
>> a defaults write)
>>
>> -- johan
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>>
>> !DSPAM:41738104679981142865824!
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
> The CSS validator uses a different form variable and a different URL.
> This seems to work (Gmail is going to break this up into multiple
> lines ... be sure it's all one line in TextMate):
>
> curl -o /tmp/`id -u`/results.html -F file=@$TM_FILEPATH
> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator && open /tmp/`id
> -u`/results.html
OK, very nice, it works fine :)
--
Jo <W:00°04'37" ; N:47°15'36">
1....'....12.....'....24.....'....36.....'....48.....'....60.....'....72
