Allan,
> Added a dock menu with New, New Project, and Open….
Thanks so much for adding this! Certainly one of the features I
personally missed from SubEthaEdit. With that said, I wonder if it might
make sense to make the menu more consistent with SEE? For instance, SEE
has "New File" instead of "New". They also use "Open file..." instead of
"Open.." IMHO, I think that SEE's wording/ellipses choices look better,
but that may be familiarity talking.
> The Text -> Change sub menu now also appears in the context menu (when
> there is a selection). Also, suggestions for spellings no longer
> appear if the selection contain newlines or tabs (previously it only
> looked at spaces).
This is also a welcome change. However, I think that instead of
"Change", which is ambiguous, you should use "Convert" or "Format" as in
the attached Service menus.
Thoughts?
Chris
--
Do the evolution. Get Firefox!
<http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=5&t=4>
Quote of the moment: /If you can't describe what you are doing as a
process, you don't know what you're doing./— W. Edwards Deming
I just built beta 11. If there are no problems this will be released
later today as 1.0.2 which should be the last in the 1.0.x series,
meaning that I'll shift priorities a bit and focus on larger
improvements for the 1.1 release.
Basically it just means that having the 1.0.2 out as “official” with
most obvious fixes done, I'll be more comfortable rewriting major parts
of TextMate even if it means the source will be in a non-functional
state for a couple of days -- but I'll still release betas as often as
it makes sense, and I'm aware of the requests expressed on this list.
was wondering if TextMate could throw a warning if the key-equivalent
you're assigning to a command will wipe out a pre-existing
key-equivalent. From what I've observed, if you add a key-equivalent
[that already exists] to a command then the command works --as
expected-- in that key-equivalent, silently overriding what was there
before. Hopefully not something too difficult? I guess that would be
helpful for macros too.
Kumar
Hi Allan,
If possible, could you make the Replace field the next tabindex after
the Find field? Right now it lands on the Sigma button, meaning I have
to double-tab to get to the Replace field.
Thanks!
Chris
--
Do the evolution. Get Firefox!
<http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=5&t=4>
Quote of the moment: /"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and
some days you are the statue."/— David Brent, Wernham Hogg
I woundered if it was possible to change the shortcut for "Insert
closing tab". cmd-opt-. isn't working on my keyboard layout. As I
understant it, opt-'.' is '>' so cmd-opt-'.' is understood as cmd-'>'
I get this problem all over the system.
Anyway, how about just cmd-'.' ? I know it's a reserved shortcut for
cancel but in a sense, it 'stop' a block. And there is no use for a
cancel in text editing. And beside, cmd and '.' and very close
toghetter while opt is all the other way of the space bar on small
keyboards ( original g4 and I think powerbook/ibook too )
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:10:05 +0100
> From: "Fred B." <fredb7(a)starflam.com>
> I started using Fugu with this release.
> Connecting locally to my server and editing using TM working fine.
Just so you know, rc2 is out now. It has fixed some problems that rc1 had.
Carl
HTML folding does not work properly in a very simple hand-written HTML
page. This is a movie depicting what happens:
http://www.hashref.com/textmate/tmbug_html_folding.mov
There I try to hide three blocks:
1. The "body" CSS element is correctly folded
2. The "style" tag is not
3. The "head" tag is not
-- fxn
Python folding seems half implemented, it does not work. As you can see
in this shot:
http://www.hashref.com/textmate/tmbug_python_folding.png
There's no mark for classes for instance, and more important if you
click on the marks to fold functions nothing happens.
-- fxn
I love the scratch macro and the ability to replay it with a keyboard
shortcut. How about a "replay last used macro"?
E.g., let's say I have a saved macro that I don't want to assign a
keyboard shortcut to, but which I do want to use over and over again
for a stretch in a document. Right now I've got to pick it out from
the menu each time.
If we had a "replay last used macro" I could just hit that keyboard
shortcut repeatedly. It could probably even replace "replay scratch
macro" and still have the same effect when the last used macro
happened to be scratch.
Thoughts?
