>I have twice posted a link to a bundle containing snippets for
>creating PHP Documentor tags in PHP scripts ... but both times the
>link has been wiped out. Now the wiki seems to have been reorganized
>so I am hesitant to repost. Should we have a new page for
>snippet-related bundles? I'm not sure if maybe people are wiping out
>my entry because it is not a syntax highlighter bundle.
Hi Kumar,
I re-posted your link to the wiki. If it disappears, I'll help you
restore it. I suspect it was deleted out of clumsiness and not any
secret standards for what should be on the front page. I think the
nature of a wiki is that all the users have to evolve standards for
how things should be organized and how people should edit. I
personally think nothing should ever be deleted. At worst, it should
be put in a separate link or 'refactored' by being summarized.
I did the last reorganization because (1) most of the front page was
obsolete due to Allan's including them in the distribution and (2)
someone had incompetently edited the front page to nuke most of the
writing people did. It's possible that in restoring the old writing
I accidentally lost some post-nuking changes you made (but I did try
to check).
best wishes, Eric
--
Eric Hsu, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
San Francisco State University
erichsu(a)math.sfsu.edu
http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu
I just joined so I apologize if this is a recurring subject, but I would
like to see TextMate become ODB protocol compliant. Specifically, I work
with a few other programs like MarsEdit which allow editing of the text
in programs like BBEdit or SubEthaEdit. I have talked with a few of the
designers including Brett and for TextMate to also be included it needs
to include the ODB protocol. Is this possible for a future release?
Thanks
Robert
All I want for Christmas is world peace, an end to hunger, and for
TextMate to either support (s)ftp or be supportive of the external
editor thing. As in this:
http://www.merzwaren.com/external_editor.html
I'd become so reliant on Transmit's ability to open a text file in
BBEdit, where I could just sit 'save' and have it upload automatically,
that having to do it by hand again is really getting up my nose.
For the moment, can anyone recommend a way to get around this lack of
support? I still have BBEdit, of course, but I'd rather be using
TextMate. I'm not so good with shell scripting so I wouldn't know the
first place to start where that's concerned.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Raena
>Just a quick note to stress that there are more and more orphaned pages
>in the wiki http://wiki.macromates.com/textmate/list/ .
>People should pay attention to other's links when they edit a page...
This is a good suggestion in general.
However, that page list isn't working right. The first three links
are from the front page. There are wanted pages that aren't listed...
I don't know how to fix it, so I'm just ignoring it for now.
- Eric
--
Eric Hsu, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
San Francisco State University
erichsu(a)math.sfsu.edu
http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu
Hey all,
Anyone know what happened to the XML bundle? Last I see from the
archives, whoever had it in an svn repo said he'd post a tarball, but
there's nothing after...then just a message much like this one, asking
where it went...
Just pining for it, s'all
d
Hi All(an),
Yet another smart release, v1.0.2ß2 is really great, print options
match exactly what we need :)
> Added a default set of smart typing pairs, these are: ({[""""]}).
Would you please add "« »"? i.e. something like
"« (caret here) »"
Have a nice week-end,
--
Jo <W:00°04'37" ; N:47°15'36">
1....'....12.....'....24.....'....36.....'....48.....'....60.....'....72
This is another minor/major feature request for Allan : )
The order of the open files windows tabs - in top of project window -
has confused me for a while, as the open files have not followed an
immediately identifiable method/structure. Having created a simple test
project with files named a1,a2, b1, b2 etc etc. I have finally worked
it out.
Newly opened files will always be added immediately behind the
currently selected tab, and not in an alphabetical order nor in a order
of opened status which I had kind of assumed it would do just like
Safari tabs do.
Therefore, could it be possible to implement this as an options
preference:
1. follow alphabetical order
2. order of open status (last opened is last in order)
IF this could be fixed I would be very grateful, as working with 10+
files open means I have to look through the tab bar for where my opened
files has been located.
What's the general view on this ? Apologies if this has been discussed
earlier without me noticing it.
Kind regards,
Mats
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:58:15 -0600 (MDT)
> From: William Douglas Neumann <wdnx(a)unm.edu>
>>There already is a feature for this: when you move over a parens/brace/etc,
>>the matching one lights up briefly.
>
> Although this could be improved as well. Right now, the hilighting only
> occurs when you move forward over the closing member of the pair (unless
> I'm missing a menu option somewhere), instead of either direction over
> either opening or closing members. BTW: Consider this a feature request,
> if it's not already an option, and a plea for guidance otherwise.
This feature is too "subtle" for me. I have great difficulty finding
the matched character. I like the way S-E-E does it: a double click on
a paren/brace/bracket selects the contents of the pair. This is very
clear and potentially very useful if you want to relocate the text.
I *reallyyyy* like putting paired characters around selected text.
That has become one of my favourite features. It makes writing nested
conditionals very easy. No more counting pairs. Selecting text between
pairs would be a nice counterpart. Hmmm, would also be useful for
single and double quotes too....
Have fun,
Carl
here is the issue i am having...
1. i scroll to a place deep within a long document to do some editing,
say a css file
2. i then switch to another document to apply some other edits, i
switch documents by clicking on their tab
3. when i return to the first document, the css file in this case, the
caret has returned to the top of the document and i have to scroll
again to find the place that i was editing...
is there anyone else having this issue?
thanks for a great product none-the-less!!
------------------------------------------------------
www.arrival5.com web
336,577,8014 mobile
336,992,3751 home office
I'm trying out 1.0.1. Hard to believe with that list of languages that
Java isn't present. I found the link to Brian Lalor's bundle for it on
the wiki, but the link is currently dead.
-Travis
Howdy textmaters. (that does sound kinda naughty, doesn't it?)
As I live in Denmark I commonly use the special danish characters æøå,
and has tried to make a command to the php htmlentities(9 command on
the selected text:
php -r "echo htmlentities('$TM_SELECTED_TEXT', ENT_QUOTES);"
But, alas, as in the terminal æøå gets mangled into
\303\246\303\270\303\245 before being entitized.
<, &, ", ' and other "normal" special chars gets converted just fine.
Is there a workaround for the brutal mangling of the innocent danish characters?
I know there is already a "Convert to entities" command, but it
converts every character, not just the special ones. And its a bit of
a chore to select every instance of a special character and running a
command on it.
Any thoughts? Anyone?
Nis "Have-a-nice-day" Sarup.
--
BTW: I have 5 Gmail invites. Write me at nis.sarup(a)gmail.com if you
are in desperate need of a new and fancy email.
I just make a rectangular selection of a column about 20 lines long, and
copied it to the clipboard.
Pasting this further down the document failed to create the extra space
needed for the code being pasted, and effectively 'merged' the pasted
code with the existing code following the insertion point.
Hard to explain. Will screen shot the steps if necessary.
drew.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:55:02 -0500 Kjell Olsen wrote:
> I can't make the date function work within the command - If I execute
> my script outside of textmate it works beautifully, but from within
> textmate I get:
>
> <code>
> date: illegal time format
> usage: date [-nu] [-r seconds] [+format]
> date [[[[[cc]yy]mm]dd]hh]mm[.ss]
> </code>
Timothy Martens' solution of using an external script which is then
called with a command works well, or -- if you'd prefer to keep it all
within TextMate, you could try something like:
ruby <<END
task_text = "$TM_SELECTED_TEXT"
task_text.gsub!("\[ \] ","[X] ")
print ""
from = File.basename("$TM_FILEPATH",".txt")
comp_time = Time.now
datestamp = comp_time.strftime("%d/%m/%Y at %H:%M")
File.open("/Users/me/completed.txt",'a'){|archive_file|
archive_file.puts
archive_file.puts "#{task_text} => in #{from} on #{datestamp}"
}
END
I ran into a similar problem, which I suspect in my case was down to
escaping the quotes in the format string wrongly. The double quotes to
form the Ruby string make this tricky. I decided to side-step the issue
slightly long-windedly by using Ruby's 'date' methods. Note also that
this code works on selected text: I have Standard in = selected text
and Standard out = Replace selected text. The selected task then gets
deleted from the original file and pasted in to the completed.txt file
with a checkbox ([X]).
I also put the date stamp on the same line as the text to make it
easier to grep for; when someone chases me about something I've done, I
can double-check when I did it ;-)
I'm a Ruby-newbie too, so I'm sure more experienced coders could make
it more efficient.
Jackie
--
Jackie Chappell
jmchappell(a)mac.com
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:17:50 -1000 Timothy Martens wrote:
> /bin/sh: line 1: ruby: command not found
>
> why? do I need the full path in line 1?
Hmm. I don't use the full path for Ruby but it works for me. Also
whereis ruby returns nothing for me, but I also have Ruby 1.8.1 in
/usr/local/bin.
my $PATH is:
PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current:
/usr/local/mysql/bin:$PATH"
export PATH
in .bashrc, but you can also put it in .bash_profile (I 'source'
.bashrc in .bash_profile). I found that if I put the default $PATH
first, the shell would find the Panther version of Ruby (in /usr/bin)
first before my 1.8.1 version in /usr/local/bin, but YMMV.
I think this must be a path issue. Does the command work if you specify
the full path instead of just ruby?
Jackie
--
Jackie Chappell
jmchappell(a)mac.com
Allan,
Thought you would like to know that my colleague at work is very happy with
the new auto-insert features in 1.02b1, I have even seen her use the
wrap-selection-in-quotes feature.
Well done.
Chris
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
Allan,
Thought you would like to know that my colleague at work is very happy with
the new auto-insert features in 1.02b1, I have even seen her use the
wrap-selection-in-quotes feature.
Well done.
Chris
DDB London - Effectiveness Agency of the Year
DDB Worldwide - Global Network of the Year
The Information given in the above email
and / or attachment is provided without warranty of
any kind, either expressed or implied on the part
of the writer or the Agency.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
1. I think the program rocks.
2. I was writing some HTML and I had the need to have a command that
jumped to the *inside* of the next tag. I couldn't figure out how to
do this in TM (or any other editor), playing with snippets and Perl
shell command ideas until I realized I could record a macro that did:
find <(.*?)> as regular expression
hit left arrow (to go to start of found selection), hit right arrow
(to skip over the <)
find [^>]* to select all characters up to the >.
It works just great.
3. In some corner of my head I feel like snippets, macros and
commands should really all be one type of automation entity. I'm not
sure how to do that, but it's a little confusing to have so much
power distributed across three different kinds of triggers...
4. Actual interface bug (in my opinion). If you start a selection,
say in the middle of the screen, and drag up past the window top, TM
should select everything up through the first character of the
document. Instead, it only selects up to the first line stopping at
the original column.
- Eric
--
Eric Hsu, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
San Francisco State University
erichsu(a)math.sfsu.edu
http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu
On 26. Oct 2004, at 19:47, Ian G. Gillespie wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good program that one can use to create a help
> file and a PDF manual without maintaining two sets of documents?
LaTeX does really nice PDF and with tex4ht I think the HTML result is
also reasonable good.
Another option is DocBook, though the PDF is not very nice when using
the freeware converters available.
Basically you just want to settle on some generic markup language that
allows you to convert it to whatever format you desire.
Which markup language is best suited probably depends mostly of what
type of documentation you're writing, i.e. is it heavily interlinked,
using all sorts of "typegraphic" features, footnotes, images etc.
Kind regards Allan
--
http://macromates.com/ ::: TextMate, OS X text editor
http://macromates.com/sigpipe/ ::: Personal weblog about
programming
On 26. Oct 2004, at 23:26, kumar mcmillan wrote:
> when copying and pasting text from one document to another document in
> a project, the pasted text gets shifted to the right one column.
Disable “Indented Paste” from the Behavior menu.
It tries to match the indent level of where you paste -- some
improvements could probably be made though (I think it fails to
properly treat spaces and tabs transparently).
> also... if you select several lines of text (like the require
> statement + comments above), then choose Text > Move Selection >
> Column Right, TextMate only moves the first line, not all lines of the
> selection. The same thing happens for Text > Move Selection > Column
> Left.
Yes, move column left/right only makes real sense for either selecting
sub-lines (e.g. words) or doing a columnar selection.
Kind regards Allan
On my US keyboard the [ ] characters do have their own keys, and if you
shift them they are { } (braces).
-rich
On 10/25/04 6:28 PM, "Allan Odgaard" <allan(a)macromates.com> wrote:
> On 25. Oct 2004, at 23:55, Richard Kilmer wrote:
>
>> I followed the procedure to copy the KeyBindings.dict file to:
>>
>> ~Library/Application Support/TextMate/KeyBindings.dict
>>
>> I want to map shift right/left to xcode-style/command + ] and command
>> + [
>>
>> "@[" = "shiftLeft:";
>> "@]" = "shiftRight:";
>>
>> But it does not seem to work!
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Are you using a US-keymap? i.e. does the [ and ] have their own keys,
> or are they e.g. on option-8, option-9 (as with some european keymaps).
>
> Kind regards Allan
>
> P.S. This is really a mailing list type of question! ;)
>
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
>
I am making a syntax module for the Rebol language and I am having
trouble getting some keywords to match properly. This expression works:
match = "(action!|any-block!|any-function!|)"
but it is not ideal for I needed it to work with word boundaries. When
I include word boundaries in the regex, the rule is never matched.
match = "\\<(action!|any-block!|any-function!|)\\>"
I think this is a problem with the exclamation point "!". I have tried
using it with these escape sequences: \!, \\!, \041 \\041; with no luck
so far.
I had the same problem with keywords having the question mark "?" in
them, ie:
match = "\\<(about|abs|absolute|action?|add|alert|type?)\\>"
Ideas would be most welcome. Is there a limitation in the regex engine?
Thanks, Jaime
It would be useful if smart typing wasn't active when writing code
comments. The reason being you're more likely to be writing natural
language sentences than code.
for example:
<?php
// Don't forget the elephants!
$elephants = true;
?>
with smart typing comes out like this:
<?php
// Don't forget the elephants!'
$elephants = true;
?>
What do other's think?
drew.