opacity should be a recogniced word in the css syntax, right?
______________________
Andreas Wahlin
Webbutvecklare
Webbhuset AB
Östra Hamngatan 45, 411 10 Göteborg
Telefon: 031-339 19 19, Direkt: 031-739 18 20, Fax: 031-711 12 20
www.webbhuset.se
Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should
destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by a reply email.
Thank you.
I'm not much of a fan of collapsing my code within the editor... it
just confuses more more than anything most of the time. Perhaps if
there was a better indicator that there was collapsed code.
However, I work with 500+-line CSS files every day, and we do a decent
job grouping these into sections visually through commenting. It would
be great if we could collapse any one of these "sections" as to help
with general organization, etc. A typical style sheet for us would
look like this:
/*
| 3. Site Structure
|________________________________________________________ */
(structure styles)
/*_______________________________________________________ */
/*
| 4. Front Page
|________________________________________________________ */
(front-page specific styles)
/*_______________________________________________________ */
I'm pretty sure all that would be needed for this are some
standardized tokens that need to appear at the section 'bookends.'
So...
/***
| 4. Front Page
|________________________________________________________ */
...
/*______________________________________________________***/
Preferably looking like this when collapsed:
/***
| 4. Front Page
|________________________________________________________ */
And then the rule would be start collapse at first instance of *** and
end at the next instance of ***. We may want to argue for a few
hundred e-mails on what a more unique token could be, and then there's
the issue of standardizing comment markup so that we can all use
it.... i'm sure it'd be easy enough to do for one example but to
account for other peoples' styles...
Thoughts on this? Anyone feel like whipping this up? I've never done
any bundle editing before but i could give it a whril so long as we
feel this is worthwhile and i've got all the rules down.
--
eric
ericdfields.com
Hello, World of TextMate !
This first mail to say hello (the next one will ask a question ;-)
My name is Francois, I live in Paris (France) and I am new to TextMate. I just discovered TextMate this week-end and paid the shareware fee immediatly. Thanks Allan for this wonderful piece of software.
I am not a programmer or any kind of hacker, just a phd student who uses LaTeX. Before using TextMate, I used TeXshop and BBEdit, Emacs (yes I tried it) and Smultron that was my editor of choice before saturday, when I started using TextMate.
What I like most in TextMate is the overall quality of TextMate and the flexibility in LaTeX editing, more precisely, the ability to keep TeXshop apart.
Well, that's all folks for this small introduction. See you soon on the list
Cheers !
Francois
Hi,
The TODO bundle has a bug: an item like this (in perl):
# TODO: $CONNECTION_TIMEOUT
is not found. If the '$' is removed it works. Apparently some
escaping issue, but I don't do enough Ruby to figure it out.
Gerd
I see another message about which sadly hasn't been answered:
http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/textmate/2006-August/012468.html
I followed the instructions at:
http://sg.validcode.at/stuff/textmate-getbundle-bundle
What I did was I removed /Library/Application Support/TextMate prior
to the installation of this bundle. Was that a mistake? There's no
mention of having to checkout the bundles first.
When I choose Bundles -> GetBundle -> Install Bundle, nothing
happens. I was expecting to get a list of the Bundles as the
instructions said, but alas.
How can I solve this?
--
Regards, Charles.
Is there anyone else having a problem with the key command for the
Text > Convert > to Titlecase menu item? I've tried both ctrl+option
+shift+u and ctrl+option+u. Neither works.
Is there a conflict somewhere that is causing it not to work? Is
there a way I can change this binding or is there a fix?
Thanks
Mike Gregoire
Hello!
I am using TextMate for Latex and the umlaute of the german language.
When I have Todos that uses umlaute, I get only questionmarks for
these. Is there an easy way to convert these characters?
greetings
Helge
Hi all,
Is there a way to add some sort of keybinding to have the key
combination SHIFT + SPACE output an underscore character?
I would be happy with this in TextMate or if anyone has any ideas for
a system wide implementation.
Cheers,
LD.