Soryu wrote:
> I take it you didn’t have a look at [MultiMarkdown](http://
> fletcher.freeshell.org/wiki/MultiMarkdown)? It is an extended version
> of Markdown and allows for footnotes in general and bibliography
> support.
Soryu, I looked at it earlier and thought it was only for BBedit and
Moving Type. Your message prompted me to look again and I saw the
TextMate Bundle Readme.md. Thank you for response.
I do not think this will thread properly, so I changed my setting
from digest to individual emails and will be able to reply then and
keep the thread unbroken.
Regards,
Lloyd
Using markdown to write drafts for later conversion to html.
Question 1: Any way to reference bibliographical information while in
the research phase of collecting information so a single
bibliographic reference can be linked to multiple notes?
Question 2: I have the posts delivered in a txt digest. How do I
reply so comment is part of the thread?
Thank you,
Lloyd
In C++ mode, what is the correct method to modify
tmthemes such that function declarations written like :
TF Funk(T1 arg1, T2 arg2)
...and...
TF Funk(
T1 arg1,
T2 arg2,)
...or...
TF
Funk(
T1 arg1,
T2 arg2,)
..are rendered identically? or is that even possible?
(TF above is the function return type, possibly more than one
word to include a storage type. T1/T2 above are argument types,
again maybe augmented by an additional word(s) like const or
default assignments).
TIA,
-Shin
(This is my first time contributing, so please be gentle.)
I've found a problem (annoyance?) with the way that the `Typeset &
View (PDF)` command works in the LaTeX bundle. I set
`TM_LATEX_COMPILER` to `latexmk.pl` so that I don't have to deal with
manually running BibTeX and all that, but I also use packages that
depend on PSTricks and thus don't work with pdfLaTeX.
The problem is that while the command normally looks for the presence
of `\usepackage{pstricks}` and then automatically uses `latex` instead
of `pdflatex` for typesetting if appropriate, this does not happen if
the compiler is set to `latexmk.pl`, since the rc file passed to the
latter says to use `pdflatex`.
I've attached a quick and dirty patch to tell `latexmk.pl` to typeset
to PostScript first if PSTricks is detected, which fixes the problem.
The patch also contains a modification to the PSTricks detection part
to add a search for the following packages which depend on it:
* [xyling] [1]
* [pst-asr] [2]
* [OTtablx] [3]
These are packages that I personally frequently use, and it's annoying
to have to manually do a `\usepackage{pstricks}` just for the sake of
telling TextMate it's being used. There's probably a better way to
detect if *any* package uses PSTricks, but it would be cool if this
could be committed for now. Feel free to consider that a completely
selfish request, though maybe there are a few other linguists who
would appreciate it. :-)
Aaron Jacobs
[1]: http://www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/~rvogel/xyling/
[2]: http://www.math.neu.edu/ling/tex/
[3]: http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders/OTtablx/
well, I'm glad to see thomas tackle bundleforge ;)
IMO, the most important thing actually is allowing for easy sharing of a
bundle and quick updating of the installed bundles -- ideally just a couple of
mouse clicks. easy bundle setup is trivial, and the rest is if secondary
importance: the focus of the server-side development should thus be on sharing
and updating.
then of course you need to take care of the UI, but I'm sure you know better
than me how to handle that! ;)
three good reasons:
* the GetBundle bundle is a solid foundation;
* in the community there is no shortage of server-side programming skills
and, most of all
* we have ten (10!) weeks without an official release, so that we can tinker
with BundleForge!
so... why don't we start doing something? :P if there's any amount of python
code involved, I'm ready to help!
Hello,
I am a plain textmate user and a complete computer/programming illiterate who
searches advice and input from other, potentially more experienced users of
textmate. When writing latex based papers using the wonderful latex bundle I
frequently want to do a quick and simple calculation. Unfortunately, this often
involves other formats than those provided by the existing math bundle and I
have to invoke an external calculator. Would it be possible to extend the math
bundle to normal calculator capabilities? IE providing
exponential/logarhithmic,
power function, trigonometric functions, numbers in ecponential notation
etc. ?
I don't know whether others miss this feature. I would certainly welcome
such extended functionality or some experienced guidance how to achieve the same
functionality with existing bundles. Using the R bundle I tried to send commands
to R, which I found very slow (and not what I would find useful), and also to
execute R on the selection, but only to the effect of receiving an error
message.
JJ
I am the maintainer of the C Library Bundle. I have removed it from
the repository until a better solution can be found. I apologize for
the trouble I have caused, I was unaware of the current practice of
discussing new bundle before adding them to the main repository and
committed my changes without thinking. It was not my intention to
offend any part of this excellent community.
My heartfelt gratitude to those of you who defended me on this list.
I hope that the C Library bundle (or a better replacement) can be
made available to those who may find it useful. If any of you would
like a copy, please contact me and I will make it available (probably
on my .Mac account).
Sincerely,
Steph
