Hi,
a common practice is to let Undo undo all characters entered during last stroke (that is, not interrupted by movements or other operations (find/replace/search) at once. That is, If I type a few words, then press Option-Z, I expect all the words to disappear, not one letter at a time. This is the way undo works in most environments, including emacs, vi, TextEdit, AppleWorks, sam, acme, Word ...
David
imo, if you copied and pasted the text in one shot then you should get the behavior you describe, but typing individual letters are each atomic actions that should be undone one at a time, as per textmate currently
On Dec 30, 2004, at 2:50 PM, David Tolpin wrote:
Hi,
a common practice is to let Undo undo all characters entered during last stroke (that is, not interrupted by movements or other operations (find/replace/search) at once. That is, If I type a few words, then press Option-Z, I expect all the words to disappear, not one letter at a time. This is the way undo works in most environments, including emacs, vi, TextEdit, AppleWorks, sam, acme, Word ...
David
For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
On Dec 31, 2004, at 0:14, Lang Riley wrote:
imo, if you copied and pasted the text in one shot then you should get the behavior you describe, but typing individual letters are each atomic actions that should be undone one at a time, as per textmate currently
Interestingly that's also how I like it :) It's predictable and it allows me to visit every previous state.
But there have been some complaints, so it'll be an option in a later release, most likely with the chunked undo as the default, seeing how most Mac apps do it like this.