17 Nov
2006
17 Nov
'06
5:56 a.m.
Hi!
I'm just working on some Tex-Document which uses several dialogues
which I want to enclose in "< "> (the result are those <<
>-enclosures in the document). Would be cool if that
could be added
to the language grammar.
Thanks in advance
Niels
17 Nov
17 Nov
1:54 p.m.
On Nov 17, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
Hi!
I'm just working on some Tex-Document which uses several dialogues
which I want to enclose in "< "> (the result are those <<
I'm not sure I understand what kind of thing we are talking about.
Can you give us a more extended result? Or perhaps a link explaining
the syntax you are talking about?
> -enclosures in the document). Would be cool
if that could be added
to the language grammar.
Thanks in advance
Niels
Haris
8:04 p.m.
On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
e.g.:
%********************** CHAPTER 2 **************************
\chapter{Kapitel2}
"<Was sollen wir? Das ist doch nicht dein Ernst?"> regte sich Shi auf.\\
"<Was'n? Is' doch keen Ding. Mach'n wa platt den Sack und ferttich
is'."> sagte Skinny gelassen.\\
And I mean the "< ">-part :)
Niels
Hi!
I'm just working on some Tex-Document which uses several dialogues
which I want to enclose in "< "> (the result are those <<
I'm not sure I understand what kind of thing we are talking about.
Can you give us a more extended result? Or perhaps a link
explaining the syntax you are talking about? > -enclosures in the document). Would be cool
if that could be added
to the language grammar.
9:37 p.m.
On Nov 17, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
e.g.:
%********************** CHAPTER 2 **************************
\chapter{Kapitel2}
"<Was sollen wir? Das ist doch nicht dein Ernst?"> regte sich Shi
auf.\\
"<Was'n? Is' doch keen Ding. Mach'n wa platt den Sack und ferttich
is'."> sagte Skinny gelassen.\\
And I mean the "< ">-part :)
When I try to compile a file containing these lines, it shows up
pretty bad. Is this something standard in LaTeX? Does it depend on
some special package perhaps? I have literally never seen these
before. Then again, there's a lot of LaTeX things I haven't seen before.
Niels
Haris
18 Nov
18 Nov
1:41 a.m.
Haris asked... (re the "< and >" quoting commands):
When I try to compile a file containing these lines,
it shows up
pretty bad. Is this something standard in LaTeX? Does it depend on
some special package perhaps? I have literally never seen these
before. Then again, there's a lot of LaTeX things I haven't seen
before.
I think they give "reverse guillemot-like" quotes when used in
German: so, for example, if
\usepackage[german]{babel}
is in the document's preamble you can use "< to produce << (OK, a
glyph something like this...).
So a working example would be
=======================================================================
\documentstyle{article}
\usepackage[german]{babel}
\begin{document}
And someone on AOL said ">ich auch!"<
\end{document}
=======================================================================
Yeah, yeah, I have no idea re German!
Cheers,
Paul
2:12 a.m.
On Nov 18, 2006, at 7:41 AM, Paul McCann wrote:
Haris asked... (re the "< and >"
quoting commands):
It seems to depend on \usepackage[german]{babel} or \usepackage
[ngerman]{babel} (I tried it with english and french and that didn't
work).
The example above ("> <") works but I've never seen it this way, the
right order would be ("< ">).
This style of enclosure is very common in Germany in fictional texts
(most of my scientific books are in English so I can't verify what's
"normal" there).
The result of this style can be ssen in the attached screenshot:
Niels *who didn't realize until today that he has never seen it in
any book in English he read"
When I try to compile a file containing these
lines, it shows up
pretty bad. Is this something standard in LaTeX? Does it depend on
some special package perhaps? I have literally never seen these
before. Then again, there's a lot of LaTeX things I haven't seen
before.
I think they give "reverse guillemot-like" quotes when used in
German: so, for example, if
\usepackage[german]{babel}
is in the document's preamble you can use "< to produce << (OK, a
glyph something like this...).
So a working example would be
======================================================================
=
\documentstyle{article}
\usepackage[german]{babel}
\begin{document}
And someone on AOL said ">ich auch!"<
\end{document}
======================================================================
=
Yeah, yeah, I have no idea re German! 
8:18 a.m.
It should work now, both ">..."< and "<...">
I am marking the text between as a string for now. The only
disadvantage of that is that you can' really use the characters on
their own, but only in pairs.
Haris
25 Jun
25 Jun
5:03 p.m.
Hi list, I'm waking a 2.5 year-old thread here :)
Would it be possible to add similar support for the french guillemots too ?
In LaTeX they can be typed as << this >>, or directly « like that »
(option-backslash and option-pipe on a US keyboard).
BTW there also is a ‹ single › version of those guillemots, though
they are not used in french AFAIK (option-# and option-$).
< this > does not work though, it prints regular lesser-than and
greater-than operators.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 15:18, Charilaos Skiadas<skiadas(a)hanover.edu> wrote:
It should work now, both ">..."< and
"<...">
I am marking the text between as a string for now. The only disadvantage of
that is that you can' really use the characters on their own, but only in
pairs.
Haris
______________________________________________________________________
For new threads USE THIS: textmate(a)lists.macromates.com
(threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
--
Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
8:50 p.m.
On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:
Hi list, I'm waking a 2.5 year-old thread here :)
Would it be possible to add similar support for the french
guillemots too ?
In LaTeX they can be typed as << this >>, or directly « like that »
(option-backslash and option-pipe on a US keyboard).
BTW there also is a ‹ single › version of those guillemots, though
they are not used in french AFAIK (option-# and option-$).
< this > does not work though, it prints regular lesser-than and
greater-than operators.
I'm a little confused, you want things between << >> or « » scoped as
strings?
5 Sep
5 Sep
8:15 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:50, Alex Ross<tm-alex(a)rosiba.com> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:
No, IIRC (sorry for the late reply…) I wanted to have « and » be
configured as matching open/close characters.
--
Damien Pollet
type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
Hi list, I'm waking a 2.5 year-old thread
here :)
Would it be possible to add similar support for the french
guillemots too ?
In LaTeX they can be typed as << this >>, or directly « like that »
(option-backslash and option-pipe on a US keyboard).
BTW there also is a ‹ single › version of those guillemots, though
they are not used in french AFAIK (option-# and option-$).
< this > does not work though, it prints regular lesser-than and
greater-than operators.
I'm a little confused, you want things between << >> or « » scoped as
strings?
4032
days inactive
5056
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alex Ross -
Charilaos Skiadas -
Damien Pollet -
Niels Kobschätzki -
Paul McCann