On Nov 17, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:

e.g.:

%********************** CHAPTER 2 ************************** \chapter{Kapitel2} "<Was sollen wir? Das ist doch nicht dein Ernst?"> regte sich Shi auf.\ "<Was'n? Is' doch keen Ding. Mach'n wa platt den Sack und ferttich is'."> sagte Skinny gelassen.\

And I mean the "< ">-part :)

When I try to compile a file containing these lines, it shows up pretty bad. Is this something standard in LaTeX? Does it depend on some special package perhaps? I have literally never seen these before. Then again, there's a lot of LaTeX things I haven't seen before.

Niels

Haris

On Nov 18, 2006, at 7:41 AM, Paul McCann wrote:

Haris asked... (re the "< and >" quoting commands):

...

When I try to compile a file containing these lines, it shows up pretty bad. Is this something standard in LaTeX? Does it depend on some special package perhaps? I have literally never seen these before. Then again, there's a lot of LaTeX things I haven't seen before.

I think they give "reverse guillemot-like" quotes when used in German: so, for example, if

\usepackage[german]{babel}

is in the document's preamble you can use "< to produce << (OK, a glyph something like this...).

So a working example would be

====================================================================== = \documentstyle{article} \usepackage[german]{babel}

\begin{document} And someone on AOL said ">ich auch!"< \end{document} ====================================================================== =

Yeah, yeah, I have no idea re German!

It seems to depend on \usepackage[german]{babel} or \usepackage [ngerman]{babel} (I tried it with english and french and that didn't work). The example above ("> <") works but I've never seen it this way, the right order would be ("< ">). This style of enclosure is very common in Germany in fictional texts (most of my scientific books are in English so I can't verify what's "normal" there). The result of this style can be ssen in the attached screenshot:

Niels *who didn't realize until today that he has never seen it in any book in English he read"

Hi list, I'm waking a 2.5 year-old thread here :)

Would it be possible to add similar support for the french guillemots too ? In LaTeX they can be typed as << this >>, or directly « like that » (option-backslash and option-pipe on a US keyboard). BTW there also is a ‹ single › version of those guillemots, though they are not used in french AFAIK (option-# and option-$). < this > does not work though, it prints regular lesser-than and greater-than operators.

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 15:18, Charilaos Skiadasskiadas@hanover.edu wrote:

It should  work now, both ">..."< and "<..."> I am marking the text between as a string for now. The only disadvantage of that is that you can' really use the characters on their own, but only in pairs.

Haris

---

For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:50, Alex Rosstm-alex@rosiba.com wrote:

On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:

...

Hi list, I'm waking a 2.5 year-old thread here :)

Would it be possible to add similar support for the french guillemots too ? In LaTeX they can be typed as << this >>, or directly « like that » (option-backslash and option-pipe on a US keyboard). BTW there also is a ‹ single › version of those guillemots, though they are not used in french AFAIK (option-# and option-$). < this > does not work though, it prints regular lesser-than and greater-than operators.

I'm a little confused, you want things between << >> or « » scoped as strings?

No, IIRC (sorry for the late reply…) I wanted to have « and » be configured as matching open/close characters.