10 Dec
2004
10 Dec
'04
5:42 a.m.
On Dec 10, 2004, at 4:06, otheraccount@verizon.net wrote:
Doh... that's the new feature about macros having their own local clipboard :( Then I'm afraid there's no real substitute.
Hm... But couldn't the selected text, rather than being cut and placed in the clipboard, just be instead sent to a file? [...]
Yes it (most likely) can -- but I don't think Normand have any real shell-scripting experience, so maybe someone could create the script/macro and throw it in a bundle ;)
However, it would mean there are two locations for cut/copied text. Although this also seems to be the case with the system kill buffer (which doesn't interfere with the clipboard).