1 Aug
2007
1 Aug
'07
1:52 a.m.
john wrote:
At least basic preliminary support for (X)HTML5 would be nice, stuff like <header>, <footer>, <section>, <article> etc. "Basic preliminary support" as in at least not marked as invalid when used with a proper doctype.
That's a grammar issue, unrelated to what subtleGradient is talking about. But I think TM should probably move to preferring html5 creation document creation in the nearish future (over html 4.01 strict, that is), as it's backwards-compatible, and better defined.
Is Infininight still planning on making a better HTML grammar? *wink*
-Jacob