Sent this a while ago, but used the wrong address so it bounced…
On Nov 10, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 10. Nov 2006, at 16:51, Matt Neuburg wrote:
Okay, but why *does* TextMate's Undo behave this way? It's a hassle for me
For me the step-by-step undo is 100% predictable, and that makes me more efficient; I know that if I did an error 3 steps ago, I need to press ⌘Z 3 times, and make the correct steps after that.
Consider this another vote for keeping the current behavior (at least as an option).
I would love chunked undo if it knew what I "meant to do", but there's no way in hell it can know that. If Allan could write software that read your mind, he would have been abducted by some government by now. :)
In my experience, when software tries to "help" you by making assumptions, it just gets in the way and annoys you. I'd rather have something tedious and predictable than something quick that makes me say "Whoa! Where the hell am I?" That's editing text the "Max Power way".
### From The Simpsons Homer (who had changed his name to "Max Power"): There are three ways to do things. The right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way! Bart: Isn't that the wrong way? Homer: Yeah… but faster.