Open source software should be free for non-commercial personal use. As I do not see any other open source software (except TM 2) that demands license.
Its quite apparent from your writing that you ve no manners. Your apology stinks.
In your (SNOBBY) opinion, except TM 2 every other open source efforts are bad examples of coding, design etc! This is outrageous and voids any other reasoning in your post.
Since 'ONLY' TM 2 is a QUALITY 'open-source' product (its still in alpha BTW), you are persuading me to pay for it (like many other members here) by calling me names.
According to your understanding, the users should be forced to contribute in the 'Open Source' TM 2 by paying for it!! Really???? What about the free option that an Open source project warrants?
-- View this message in context: http://textmate.1073791.n5.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-pay-for-the-final-TM-2-li... Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.