14 Sep
2006
14 Sep
'06
9:14 p.m.
On 14/9/2006, at 23:03, William D. Neumann wrote:
[...] This happened to me a week or so ago, when one of my revisions had to be rolled back because it thought a really old version of the grammar was up to date. If you run svn up and still have this issue, then if might be best to scrap the lot and do a fresh checkout.
In the interest of sharing, this also just happened for Michael Sheets, who thus did similar to an HTML grammar change I’d committed.
This would seem to be a rather serious flaw in svn -- anyone familiar with this flaw? i.e. is it known/reproducible/PIBCAC/similar?