Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 26. Oct 2006, at 15:11, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Jacob Rus wrote:
Fred B wrote:
I think you should fork Markdown and make TextDown. And don't tell me you don't have the time. Ok, I'm out. :D
This is sort of the plan, but it's on hold for a while.
What's the hold up? Just curious if there is some way we could help...
It’s just that I try to only focus on TM 2.0 development stuff prior to leaving for NZ, so I can hold a 10 weeks vacation with good conscious :)
JEG2: I'm going to try to spec a bunch of it out while allan is on vacation, so that we can refine/implement it when he gets back. At that point we can ask for some broader feedback. Though I'm still not clear on the best way to do definition lists, footnotes, and tables. I would bring these back up on the Markdown list, but it seems less useful recently than it once was, spending all of its time arguing at great length about things of (IMO) no import whatsoever, while avoiding major issues with hand-wavey explanation.
-Jacob