29 Mar
2006
29 Mar
'06
7:01 p.m.
On Mar 29, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
The thought of all that redundancy bothers me; perhaps there's some way of "subclassing" the XML language type? Or is there an entirely different way to handle this kind of thing?
It's called: include='text.xml'; just create a new language with this in its patterns, that should do it, I think. You could even override some of the scopes to get finer results, if desired.
Trevor
Haris