On Feb 2, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Trevor Harmon trevor@vocaro.com wrote:
I certainly agree this procedure is not very user-friendly, but is it still the way to go? Or have things changed in TextMate 2?
My ideas are very inchoate and I appreciate the discussion of the opposing point of view, so please keep countering me.
My thought here is: It is wrong to look for user-friendliness in TM2.
Non-power users of TM2 are probably not going to be capable or desirous of changing _anything_; they will love the text editing features and will learn to use them, in the same way that I use TM for editing and running Ruby or writing Markdown without worrying about _how_ it works behind the scenes, but they won't do any tweaking.
Anyone, on the other hand, who does _any_ tweaking is promoted to a power user! And such a person, I argue, _will_ have to make these sorts of non-user-friendly adjustments. To make a non-user-friendly way to let non-power users do what power users do would dilute and confuse the program. TM2 is like emacs: you can take what you're given or you can make adjustments, but there is no naive user-friendly way to make those adjustments, nor should there be. TM2 is like Flammarion's woodcut:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flammarion.jpg
Either stay on your side of the universe and enjoy the beauty of nature, or peek behind the curtain and blow your mind. There is no middle course.
m.
-- matt neuburg, phd = matt@tidbits.com, http://www.apeth.net/matt/ pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei Programming iOS 7! http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920031017.do iOS 7 Fundamentals! http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920032465.do RubyFrontier! http://www.apeth.com/RubyFrontierDocs/default.html TidBITS, Mac news and reviews since 1990, http://www.tidbits.com