I'm not entirely sure if it's WP-specific - it's certainly not part of the MT spec, from what I understand.
WP provides for multiple values for the one key, which is why the numeric ids are there; if no ID is present, WP will create a new field, regardless of prior fields with the same key.
I like your idea of using the x- prefix; perhaps a syntax like:
x-«field»-«identifier»: «value»
..Would provide for the numeric ID? Thoughts?
On 28/11/2008, at 11:03 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 28 Nov 2008, at 04:33, Michael Tyson wrote:
[...] format: Custom: field_name (field_id) = field_value
Where field_id is an optional numeric value, and retrieved when fetching posts.
Is this specific to WP, i.e. allowing field retrievel via numeric ids?
I think I would prefer a syntax more like:
x-«field»: «value»
But that does not allow for numeric value, but I am sort of assuming all custom fields should just be passed to server as key/value pairs!?!
textmate mailing list textmate@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate