11 Aug
2007
11 Aug
'07
9:45 p.m.
--
Brad Miller
Assistant Professor, Computer Science
Luther College
On 8/11/07, Charilaos Skiadas cskiadas@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Brad Miller wrote:
>
> > What do you think of the attached screen shot?
>
> I would prefer to make it clear that this is script is to be used in
> place of a direct engine, with some checkbox somewhere. In fact, this
> should be an alternative to latexmk. i.e. I am thinking of it as
> having a checkbox that makes it clear to the user that they have
> enabled a custom script or latexmk.pl, instead of the direct choices
> on the top.
>
> Also, I think that there is some %!TEX directive that users can use
> to force the use of a particular "TeXShop engine" (i.e. what we cann
> a custom script), which would be nice if we can respect in some way.
So, I'm not understanding what you mean by a TexShop engine.
Maybe this setup would be more descriptive. The text entry box would only
be active if the checkbox was checked.
>> Btw, why is latexmk.pl an option in the popup? Is it independent of
> >> the four options there?
> >
> > I didn't put it in the popup because its not the same thing as the
> > others. Plus, potentially latexmk.pl could be instructed to use
> > the engine specified by the popup.
>
> Oh it can? How? If that's the case, then of course it should be kept
> separate.
>
> Haris Skiadas
> Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
> Hanover College
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate@lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
