On 9 Dec 2013, at 15:55, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[…] TM2 takes significant longer time to syntax highlight […]
It also does more, like allowing injections and using document content as part of the actual scope.
TM2 is also slower on auto completion for some files […]
This is because TM2 is more flexible in how words are defined so it needs to lookup scope settings for each character when collecting the list of words.
Is there anything that can be done to increase the performance in these two areas?
I don’t know what you want answered here, as you probably already know that a solution can be implemented in an infinite number of ways, so it would be quite an achievement if TextMate 2 alpha has already arrived at the fastest possible implementation.