I don't think I saw someone mention it in here (sorry for repeating if they did!), but I just checked the FAQ because i vaguely recalled Allan saying something on the faq about not asking about TM2, and sure enough:
Q: Are there any news?
No.
(- August 04, 2008).
:P
It's kind of funny to me that my two favorite programs by far (textmate and quicksilver) have a completely unknown development schedule (although quicksilver's is now dead :[ ). oh well! Theyre both kind of like os x - you can't complain very legitimately about their faults because they're just so much better than the alternatives. On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Nicholas Cole nicholas.cole@gmail.comwrote:
I would also gladly pay for a new version with a working undo feature and the ability to split the view. Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything else that I really feel I'm lacking, but I feel the lack of those two things on a daily basis.
And, without meaning to start any kind of 'editor war', I do note that the MacVim team have now managed to create a version of vim that doesn't look so out of place on a mac, and I'm sure the same is true of the various emacs ports. And all of the rest of the competition.
Textmate's competition is not standing still. Which is not to say that there should be a version for the sake of it - far from it. But...but...it is hard not to be impatient for those improvements which would make a big difference to daily use.
textmate mailing list textmate@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate