Hi,
I'm not sure whether somebody has asked this before, but what is the
current status of Ruby bundle compatibility with 1.9, at least for
execution in TM preview window?
I'm trying to execute simple ruby script with ⌘R:
> #!/usr/local/bin/ruby-1.9
> puts "Ala ma kota".reverse
I get:
> RubyMate r8136 running Ruby r1.9.0 (/usr/local/bin/ruby-1.9) >>>
> test.rb
> :0:in `require': /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/
> Bundles/Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13:
> invalid multibyte char (SyntaxError)
> /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/Bundles/
> Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13: invalid
> multibyte char
> /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/SharedSupport/Bundles/
> Ruby.tmbundle/Support/RubyMate/catch_exception.rb:13: syntax error,
> unexpected $end, expecting ')'
> ...ML e.message.sub(/`(\w+)'/, '‘\1’').sub(/ -- /, ' — ')...
> ... ^
> Program exited.
AFAIK 1.9 is getting closer towards stable release, so the final
syntax, and for sure it is much faster than 1.8, so for executing some
simple tasks but time consuming tasks it may be a good alternative to
1.8.
Cheers,
--
Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :|
Greetings,
When I google the two terms "bbedit balance" (without the quotes) and
the resulting search ranks a textmate mailing list post as #1, I start
thinking, "I wonder if Allan is aware of this?"
I checked previous discussions (but only through 2006) to see if
anything had developed in the realm of balancing braces in the way that
"the app formerly known as the mac programmers first choice" did, back
in the day. And by the looks of things, I see only heavyweight solutions
to balance tags, which I believe is way more than I need and possibly
not what I want.
I also think it's undesirable to download an eval copy of "the app
formerly known as the mac programmers first choice" for this feature.
Perhaps my Christmas wish will be:
Oh please,
Oh please,
Deliver command b,
Under the tree.
Cheers!
the nameless popular programmers
On Apr 30, 2008, at 07:00, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Whether this will be implemented any time soon, or ever, is an open
> question, but several months ago we had some good discussions on
> ##textmate about how to make the most incredible indented softwrap
> the world has ever seen.
Is that conversation archived anywhere? I'd be curious to know what
people were attempting and what they were able to achieve.
Hi,
Creating a nomenclature with nomencl needs to invoke MakeIndex with
the following:
makeindex ⟨filename ⟩.nlo -s nomencl.ist -o ⟨filename ⟩.nls
The *.nlo file is successfully created after running LaTeX and I would
like invoke MakeIndex as I do it when compiling the document with LaTeX.
How could I do that?
Thanks in advance,
Christian
On 2008-05-01, at 07:00 , Allan Odgaard wrote:
> I have these notes from Jacob: http://pastie.textmate.org/189818
Thanks for that link, Allan. I thought, perhaps, someone had developed
some additional parameters for something like Markdown already. I like
everything that Jacob sketches out there.
Did anyone write anything that attempts the indented softwrap? (This
question is for the entire list.)
Hi,
When I work with new projects I often orientate on old ones. Therefore
I include these old files in the project drawer within my new project.
Often I copy something from the old ones. To prevent the old
(original) files from being changed during that, is there way to lock
it or give only rights for reading to it?
Thanks in advance
Christian
Hello,
For my glossary I use the package gloss. After a LaTeX run of the
document gloss creates a .gls.aux is created. In need to invoke BibTeX
on that file and would like to it with a nice shortcut as I do it when
using the command+L for creating my bibliography.
How could this be done with TextMate?
Thanks in advance,
Christian
Hi,
what is the best way to detect whether only DIALOG1 is available or
DIALOG2?
Up to now I would do this by checking whether the shell variable
DIALOG_1 is set. If yes I can use DIALOG2 features, if not I have to
use DIALOG1 syntax.
But I do not know whether there will be a change in the near future?
Thanks,
--Hans
Hi
the original command to get man doc from Tcl commands in Tcl mode was
broken (at least in my system -with Developer Tools installed) I have
simplify it to a simpler and working script borrow from the Shell
script mode one:
----------------
word=${TM_SELECTED_TEXT:-$TM_CURRENT_WORD}
try_man () {
if man n -w "$word" &>/dev/null; then
page=$("$TM_SUPPORT_PATH/bin/html_man.sh" n "$word")
echo "<meta http-equiv='Refresh' content='0;URL=tm-file://$page'>"
exit_show_html
fi
}
try_man
echo "Couldn’t find documentation in 'man n' for “${word}”"
-----------------
- Juan Falgueras
Hi everyone,
Well here it goes. I am using TextMate to create ruby code. I can run
the scripts from the command line without issue. However when I run
the same script from with TextMate using command-R I end up with an
error stating it can not find the installed files seen from the
command line. I would appreciate any help with figuring this out.
Having quite a bit of editing to do in the future I would prefer to
remain in the same environment and not have to switch back and forth
during the development.
John Hannah
