For editing xml, I'm really missing a clickable outliner of the xml document
that lets me easily jump to different nodes. I know TextMate isn't an IDE
but I would love this functionality (it's in jedit as well as part of the
sidekick plugin.) Here's a screen shot of Eclipse's outline view of an xml
document http://img.skitch.com/20080528-f34dyh22e7sm7j7h218ymaqtxm.jpg
It doesn't look like xmlMate bundle has this kind of functionality. Does it
exist in some other bundle out there?
Thanks
--
Rick
Hi,
I do not know if this request is a general one, but in the past it
often happens to me that I want to get the content of a tooltip in
order to do something with it. A simple example is the output of
"Statistics of Doc/Sel". Sometimes I want to insert that info into my
document.
[The same for the HTML tooltip (?)]
Is there a way to provide such a functionality? Now I do the
following: Change the command's output behaviour to "Create New Doc",
invoke the command again, and reset the command's output behaviour.
But this is a bit annoying.
Of course, to find a proper key/mouse event could be a bit tricky. All
key events are bound to text document except for ESC. Thus my question
is: Does anyone have an idea?
Cheers,
--Hans
I have a page of text edited in Text Mate. I want to know the number of
characters in a specific paragraph (by highlighting that paragraph). Is this
possible in Text Mate and if yes, how?
Thanks in advance.
Hiya, I've started compiling using MTASC from Textmate using the
'Build with MTASC' option. I'm using the XTraceTest.as file (at the
bottom) and it compiles great.
What I can't figure out is how to target the Stage from my class, if
I have movieclips on there that I want to target for example. I can
target the _root but this isn't ideal.
Any suggestions much appreciated
Cheers :)
Ali
import com.mab.util.debug;
class XTraceTest extends MovieClip{
static function main() {
debug.waitForSocketConnection = true;
debug.initSocket("127.0.0.1");
debug.trace("Yo, whaz upppppp:?");
debug.trace("This is a really really really really really really
really really really really really long string");
debug.trace("[DEBUG] This is a debug string");
debug.trace("[WARN] This is a warning");
debug.trace("[NORMAL] This is a normal formatter string");
debug.trace("[CRITICAL] This is a critical warning");
for(var a = 0; a < 10; a++) {//say hi 10 times
debug.trace("Hi server! " + a);
}
var testOb = {question:"Are you cool?", response:"Of course!"};
debug.dumpObject(testOb);
}
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alistair Colling
Interactive Developer
FPP Brand Communications (Newcastle upon Tyne)
The Courtyard
Dinsdale Place
Sandyford
Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 1BD
Telephone: +44 (0)191 261 6662
Fax: +44 (0)191 233 2511
This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.
It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender at the e-mail address above.
FPP Design Limited. Reg. Office: The Courtyard, Dinsdale Place, Sandyford, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 1BD.
Registered Number 3775564. Registered in England and Wales. Visit our website at http://www.fpp.net/
Hi,
I've been playing around recently with developing a different
technique for sectioning in LaTeX; put simply, instead of writing
\section{}
...
\subsection{}
...
\subsection{}
...
\subsubsection{}
...
you write
\begin{sect}{}
...
\begin{sect}{}
...
\end{sect}
\begin{sect}{}
...
\begin{sect}{}
...
\end{sect}
\end{sect}
\end{sect}
I'm not 100% convinced that this is an easier way to write than
LaTeX's absolute method as opposed to this sort of relative one, but
I'm willing to give it a try for my thesis to see how it works out.
The advantages are that folding is more easily supported :) and that
it's much easier to move sections around without having to search/
replace all of the \\(sub){0,2}section commands.
But here's the thing...I know it would take you guys orders of
magnitude less time than it would take me to adjust the LaTeX bundle
to integrate this structure into it. (Starred sections look like
\begin{sect*}{} and optional ToC section titles are with \begin{sect}
[toctitle]{...}.)
All I'm really missing is the nice outlining features. Is this an easy
change to make to the bundle?
Many thanks,
Will Robertson
Hi
I'm just starting using TextMate and at the same time starting to learn
Flex/ActionScript 3. I've got a project that I was previously working on in
FlexBuilder, and I have managed to get that to build and run through
TextMate. I can open mxml files and make changes absolutely fine there, but
if I go into a .as file and try to make any sort of alteration then TextMate
hangs and I have to Force Quit.
Anyone seen this before, or have an idea?
Cheers
L
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/TextMate-hangs-when-editing-an-ActionScript3-file-tp1…
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi list,
I have just installed the Mercurial Bundle, and I have a little
problem. Let's say I have a project, and 2 files have been edited
since the last commit. When I check it at the command line, I see the
two "M" markers for the 2 files.
But inside textmate, it is like the "hg status" command only applies
to the file I am currently viewing, so I only get the "M" for the file
I am viewing. And if I am viewing a file that hasn't ben changed, I
don't see anything at all.
Is there some special setup that I might have missed?
I have saved my project as "a project" in textmate. I open it using
project.tmproj file. I saw from the help, that if the file doesn't
belong to a project, it is checked alone. Is it a problem if my
project files are actually a symlink to a another repository that
lives in /var/www?
Best regards,
Hi,
The syntax coloring in phpmate when I use it to look up PHP documentation is
very hard to read for me (bright red on black, etc) and I was wondering if
there's a way to change it (it'd be great if it could match my syntax
coloring) or at least remove it
Thanks,
Nick
Hi textmates,
A while ago I was asking about mixing R and markdown in a similar way Sweave uses LaTeX to document R codes. It turns out the "brew" package (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2007/000327.html) can make this very easy: any text outside markers in the document is unprocessed by R and returned unchanged, while R code chunks inside some special tags is run by R (creating graphics, etc...). This combined with Multimarkdown provides a very powerful workflow (by-passing the latex syntax and long compilation time I find overly intruding in Sweave).
Obviously, I'd love to have a custom syntax highlighting to go with this new approach. It would be heavily based on Sweave's bundle, with only a few differences:
1) Multimarkdown is to be used as the normal text syntax (conditional syntax highlighting and commands)
2) the "@" and "<< >>" delimiters are now replaced by "<%"
( 3) instead of calling latex, the perl script for multimardown could be used )
I've tried to tweak the Sweave bundle, but I don't really understand the code to be honest: i think i was too naive in thinking that changing sweave to "breweave" and text.tex.latex to text.html.markdown.multimarkdown everywhere could work.
Is there some sort of guidelines I should follow to modify the Sweave bundle? Would this be fairly doable by a novice in Ruby and TM macros?
Best regards,
baptiste
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
I am a new registered user to textmate.
I realize that textmate implements automatic pairing of delimiters such as
parentheses. However, this does not prevent you from removing one of the
paired parentheses etc during the editing process. In vi, I would use ³%²
to toggle between open and close delimiters to debug syntax. I can¹t find a
similar feature in textmate.
I wonder if someone has written a macro to implement this. or am I missing a
feature? Is this specific to a bundle? I am using the R and C bundles.
thanks!
peter r
Hi,
I run TM 1.5.7 (1464) on 10.5.2 ppc.
I'm a keyboard person. If I open the standard Find Dialog and I would
like to choose a previous used Find pattern, I press ARROW-DOWN to
open the history list; then I go to my desired pattern; and finally to
select it I press ENTER or RETURN. But pressing ENTER/RETURN not only
selects my pattern but also starts the Find/Replace process, which can
be a bit annoying caused by the issue that I didn't choose my replace
pattern yet.
Is there a way in TM 1 or TM 2 to get rid of the "tiny problem"?
Meaning, if the history list is open ENTER/RETURN _only_ selects the
list item?
Many thanks,
Hans
Hi!
I have a strange problem lately when I compile tex-files (actually I
can't say how "new" the problem is because I didn't compile a tex-file
for a longer time now):
When I compile a file with a bibliograpy the cite-fields won't get
filled out. Let's say I have a bib-item with the bibkey test:2007sf
(authors last name test, year 2007) and I write for example \cite[p.
45]{test:2007sf} it will compile to (?, p. 45). In the log-file stands
that the item cannot be found in the bbl-file. Looking into the
bbl-file the item is there. Even several recompiles won't work.
But if I compile the file with TeXShop everything works as expected. A
re-compile with TextMate will then also compile as expected. If I
introduce new items via \cite the same problem as before occurs.
I use TM 1.5.7 (1464) and update my bundles regularly via svn. The
TeX-distributions I am using are gwTeX and TeXLive 2007 and I use
Latexmk.pl for compiling my files with TM which uses pdflatex (but
with latex the same problem occurs).
Any ideas what's happening here?
Niels
The "Change Current" command in the LaTeX Bundle seems to always select the
outermost environment rather than the innermost. For example, if the caret is
on the line with the equation in the following:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
\begin{equation}
f(x) = x
\end{equation}
\end{enumerate}
I would expect that hitting Control-Option-E would let me change the equation
environment to something else, but instead it selects the enumerate
environment. Is there a way to change this? Thanks for any help!
-Daniel
I am new to TextMate, and am using it for LaTeX, and finding it loads of fun. I
can't seem to get cite completion to work, however. If I put the caret inside a
\cite{} command, along with some text, and press escape, it does complete the
citation and cycle through my bibtex database. But if I press option-esc, it
gives me an error message in a tooltip. (The error declares that it cannot find
my bibtex database.) I'm expecting it to give me a menu of citation choices.
I have a standard MacTeX setup, running on a MacBook under OS 10.5.2. My bibtex
database is found in ~/Library/texmf/bibtex/bib.
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Kyle
I have to develop with someone else's styleguide and it requires to
break every line at 80 characters.
Is it possible to get any visual clue where r.g. 80 columns are?(I
mean a vertical line like most texteditors have... not the column
number on the bottom)
Would be nice to have that feature, since the "right margin indicator"
as is present in textmate is pretty useless I think.
It only shows where the window is larger than the rightmost column
fully visible?(What is it for anyway?)
Maybe I am just missing something...
Thomas
How can I comment out a region (selection) of code? In other words, select
several lines of code, right click (or key combo) and comment out that
section (adding the correct lang comment tag).
Thanks
Stephen cox
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Add-a-comment-region-tp17397875p17397875.html
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
As I set up Reformat Comment commands for the languages I use most
frequently (LaTeX and R), it occurred to me that maybe there's a way
to make a single call to rubywrap more generic, so that we don't need
a command per bundle. This is the result:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
$LOAD_PATH << "#{ENV["TM_SUPPORT_PATH"]}/lib"
require "escape"
scope = ENV["TM_SCOPE"]
case scope
when /comment\.(block|line)\.number-sign\./
cstring = "# "
when /comment\.(block|line)\.percentage\./
cstring = "% "
end
flags = ""
flags += " -p \"#{cstring}\" "
flags += " --retabify" if ENV["TM_SOFT_TABS"] == "NO"
text =`echo -n "#{e_as(STDIN.read).gsub(/[$`]/, '\\\\\0')}" | ruby "#
{ENV["TM_SUPPORT_PATH"]}/bin/rubywrap.rb" #{flags}`
print e_sn(text)
The parameters are the same as the current command, with the
exception of scope, which I set to "comment.line, comment.block".
I also added a gsub to the command because it was eating latex math
and R symbols ($). There's probably a better solution to that. This
seems to work for me, and should be extended easily by adding lines
to the case statement for other languages. One advantage is that by
specifying the comment character based on the scope, it ought to work
for anything; it catches comments for both bash and perl, for
instance, without any extra effort. I think it's kind of cool.
-Alan
Hi all,
I have made some changes to the way that scripts are run. To
accommodate this I had to update the Ruby and Python bundles to be
compatible (it's a change for the better).
If you update either of these bundles, you are going to have to update
Support as well if you want the Run (⌘R) commands to work.
I do apologise for any inconvenience, but it is for the best.
LD.
Hello,
I'm relatively new to TextMate.
When I try and launch textmate from the terminal (via 'mate'), textmate
hangs.
Interestingly, if textmate is already open, this doesn't occur.
Eventually I have to force quite textmate. I am running Leopard (10.5.2) on
an Intel Core 2 Due iMac.
Anyone else have this problem?
Thanks.
Steve
Hello,
I just want to ask if anybody can confirm TM taking the 564MB physical
(1.3GB VM) with this simple test:
$ otool -tv /Applications/TextMate.app/Contents/MacOS/TextMate > /tmp/
tm.s
/tmp/tm.s is ~11MB
Close TM, and run:
$ mate /tmp/tm.s
Open Activity Monitor and check TM memory usage.
It means if I open 3 such files I'm out of my RAM. This is really
nothing good. I'd accept 1:5 filesize/mem usage ratio, but 1:50 is
kind too much.
Would it be any better in TM 2.0? I hope we can try some beta soon.
Regards,
--
Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :|
Hi again,
I have added process.rb to Support/lib. It has a single method,
TextMate::Process.run() that can be used to gracefully handle opening
processes and capturing their output. I would encourage everyone to
use it if you are scripting processes. Especially if you want the
process to take advantage of the interactive input features which
should be released sometime in the near future. If processes are
opened with this method, then they should benefit from any other
features that are added for dealing with processes over time.
There is a blurb in the file on how to use it. Would be interested to
hear any comments you might have on it.
Just to clarify the implication of this…
In the next release of TM on (once the bundles have been updated to
use TextMate::Process.open()) whenever a process requests input, a
dialog will be presented to the user giving them a chance to enter
input. The classic use case for this is the Subversion bundle. No more
never ending commits while svn is waiting for you to enter your
credentials.
LD.
Hi
trying to have a dynamic dict inside TM, I have build the next command
dict "$TM_CURRENT_WORD" | enscript -Whtml -E -e --color -p -
with Input: sel text or word, output html
but I only get a window with the message:
enscript: malformed argument `html' for option -W, --option: no comma
found
while the same command in Terminal do fine
dict word | enscript -Whtml -E -e --color -p -
But if you put
dict "$TM_CURRENT_WORD" | enscript --language=html -E -e --color -p -
it works perfectly! I feel curious about it.
Juan Falgueras Cano
Profesor Titular de la Universidad de Málaga
Hi,
Anyone seen Chandler McWilliams, creator of the Processing bundle?
I've a patch attached for the Run command. It basically works the way
you think it should now.
Cheers,
yong
Hi, I’m trying to use ${5:helper text} variable in my regular expression
later in the code:
${5/(e)|(.*)/(?1:\te.preventDefault\(\);\n)(?2:)/}})
What I do here? I check if $5 equals "e" and if it does, I append
".preventDefault();" to my "e". But I’d like to write something like this:
${5/($5)|(.*)/(?1:\t$5.preventDefault\(\);\n)(?2:)/}})
Which simply means I’d like users to be able to change "e" into, for example
"event".
My whole snippet, for better understanding:
bind('${1:event name}'${2:, ${3:passed object}}, function(${4:e}) {
${0:$TM_SELECTED_TEXT}
${4/(e)|(.*)/(?1:\t\/$4.preventDefault\(\);\n)(?2:)/}})
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Snippet%E2%80%99s-%24variables-in-RegExp-tp17302873p1…
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
