Hi,
I've just upgraded to b9. In project mode (otherwise it does not
occur) if I type a ~ or ´ TextMate offers to delete the file with
the "Would you like to move the selected files to the Trash?" dialog
box.
I did an update svn checkout, trashed TextMate preferences, and tried
in two different machines (running Tiger). I had to go back to b8.
Any hints?
Regards,
Rui
Whenever a LaTeX document has sectioning commands, I get the following
in the console:
TextMate regex error: undefined group option
pattern: \{[^{}\n]*(?R)?[^{}\n]*\}
Don't know if it's the expected behavior or not, thought I'd report it.
( I also get various messages of the form "TextMate debug: $1 bits
used" upon exit, where $1 is a number depending on what bundles have
been loaded, but somehow I don't feel that worried about that. )
Haris
So I wanted to open souce in Safari in TextMate even after javascript html
injection, if any one is interested you can add this to the scripts menu, I
pipe it through tidy though one wouldn't need to.
sam d
--start
tell application "Safari" to do JavaScript "document.body.outerHTML;" in
first document
set s to the result
set filename to random number from 1 to 10000
set the temp_file to ((path to the temporary items folder) as string) &
filename & ".html"
open for access temp_file with write permission
write s to (temp_file as alias) as string
close temp_file
set f to POSIX path of temp_file
do shell script "tidy -i '" & f & "' '" & f & "'| ~/bin/tm -a"
--end
Suppose you have two snippets, like:
\\begin{${1:name}}
$2
\\end{${1:name}}
and
\\emph{${1:emphasized text...}}
and suppose we want to insert the second snippet while editing $2 of
the first snippet. Then the snippet will not expand. On the other hand,
working only with the first snippet, once we are done editing $2 and
press tab, we will conveniently move out of the snippet.
One the other hand, we could have the first snippet as:
\\begin{${1:name}}
$0
\\end{${1:name}}
This has the advantage that the second snippet will work while editing
$0, but the disadvantage that tabbing will no longer take us out of the
first snippet.
Questions:
1) Is there a workaround to make both things possible?
2) More generally is it possible, or planned in the future, to support
activating a new snippet while in the process of completing another
snippet?
3) If there is no workaround, do people have a preference on which of
the two situations is more useful?
thanks,
Haris
Hi,
I'm setting up my environment on Tiger from scratch and TM is giving
me lip with the "Pipe text through" in the Web Preview. Markdown.pl
lives in:
~/usr/local/bin/Markdown.pl
which i what I've placed in the Pipe through field. Permissions on
the script are correct: chmod +x /usr/local/bin/markdown.pl
TM tells me: "/bin/bash: line 1: /Users/tim/usr/local/bin/
Markdown.pl: No such file or directory"
by .bash_profile has: export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/
php5/bin:/usr/sbin
in it. Any ideas. I probably missing something really basic.
Thanks,
-t
On 20 mai 05, at 03:53, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> this is one of the reasons I keep these betas as unofficial,
> beacause these things are more work in progress than usual!
I just wonder if it's a good thing to have Beta 9 as the "official"
download on MacUpdate with no explanation at all...
Maybe it is just me and not the software. These are the problems
that I am encountering. I am running latest version that came out
yesterday and I checked out bundles.
1) Tab completion is not working for me any longer. I am coding a
index.rhtml file and typing h1 followed by a tab and it does not
complete the tag. This is the case for everything that uses a tab.
Non-tab auto completes work.
2) my html comments is making for some ugly code in-between the begin
and end comment tag. It was fixed in an earlier version.
3) color coding in my .css files is inexistent
Can someone shed some light on the subject. I find this very
annoying and slowing down my productivity.
Thanks :-)
I removed all files in Applicaiton Support/TextMate and performed a
checkout. XML still does not work. It's styled by some other theme,
but not the XML theme. If it were the XML theme, namespaces would be
a different color than the tag itself. I can assert this by trying to
customize the XML theme but having no changes take place. My XML
files are styled according to the SimpleTheme, and unstyled if i
uncheck the SimpleTheme.
Todd
