I've tried to make the citation and bibliography commands detect
where your installation is, so that you shouldn't have to set any
environment variables for those any more. So once again, those brave
among you and with no paper deadlines, please remove any special PATH
specifications that you had made just for LaTeX TM (likely based on
previous recommendations by me), and let me know if the commands
still work for you, and if not then also where, to the best of your
knowledge, your tex binaries are. (Probably doing: "which kpsewhich"
from the terminal should give that to you.
Thank you all again for your patience in this transitive period.
Haris
I am having a problem with the GTDAlt date picker. The date inserted
does not correspond to the date entered. So entering 12/03/2007 gives
me 2007-03-11. And entering 31/05/2007 gives me 2007-05-29.
While on the topic of the date picker a small issue about the UI.
Dates are entered day month year. I think it should be year month day
for two reasons:
1. That way it is consistent with what is entered in the file.
2. The date picker defaults to the current date which is now
February. Helpfully it doesn't allow you to pick a day not in that
month. So to enter in 31/05/2007 I first had to tab ahead to change
the month before entering the day (since there are not 31 days in
February). The year month day format would avoid this problem.
Thanks.
All the best, Mark
_________________
Mark Eli Kalderon
Department of Philosophy
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
Departmental webpage: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy
Personal webpage: http://markelikalderon.com
Hi there
I have a non-public Wordpress blog behind a htpasswd
authentification. Is it someway possible to use the blogging bundle
all the same? When trying to fetch the posts, I get the following
errors:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/client.rb:533:in `do_rpc': Authorization
failed. (RuntimeError)
HTTP-Error: 401 Authorization Required from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/
client.rb:409:in `call2'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/client.rb:399:in `call'
from /Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles/Blogging.tmbundle/
Support/lib/metaweblog.rb:31:in `getRecentPosts'
from /Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles/Blogging.tmbundle/
Support/lib/blogging.rb:547:in `fetch'
from /Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles/Blogging.tmbundle/
Support/lib/blogging.rb:546:in `popen'
from /Library/Application Support/TextMate/Support/lib/progress.rb:
11:in `call_with_progress'
from /Library/Application Support/TextMate/Bundles/Blogging.tmbundle/
Support/lib/blogging.rb:546:in `fetch'
from /tmp/temp_textmate.V9d44n:3
Thanks for any help in advance!
Oliver
TextMate has a syntax element called "Embedded Source", which is used
for things like the lstlisting environment in LaTeX or JavaScript
code embedded in HTML. The default background color for this element
is a light blue, which is almost identical to the light blue used for
selected text. Because of the similarity, I always get confused and
think I've inadvertently selected some embedded source. I'm wondering
why there is such a similarity between these colors. Was it
deliberate (and if so, what was the reason?) or was this an oversight?
Trevor
Hello:)
1) I know that my use of Latex is different from the majorities of
the users because I create especially packages. I need to have a
really different completion. I need for example :
newcommand
renewcommand
RequirePackage
newcounter
setcounter
stepcounter
newlength
etc..
for xkeyval
define@cmdkey
define@boolkey
presetkeys....
for ifthen
ifthenelsee etc....
etc...
I would like to know the good way to obtain this
Is it necessary that I modify LateXCommandCompletions.rb ?
2) But I do not understand why in the LateXCommandCompletions.rb,
there are words like pi, Pi, lim etc ... words with 2 or 3 letters ?
Which is the interest to complement these words?
greetints alain
I don't know if I'm using TextMate in a strange way, but: I have an HTML
blogging project open with a couple of root folders, and each of those
folders have one sub-folder for archive purposes. Every now and then I like
to archive posts from the main folder into the sub-folder, but when I do
this the sub-folder unfurls - and I really don't want this to happen. Is
there any way to stop it? A preference I can check somewhere? Why does it
open in the first place; is this behavior useful to some other workflow or
language?
Thanks for any thoughts
- david
I just updated to the latest cutting edge version, and updated my
bundles. I wanted to try the Ruby auto complete, but either I'm doing
something wrong, or it just doesn't work.
No matter what I try to type, all I get is a tooltip saying "No
matches were found". In a Ruby/Rails document, I start typing
'validates' (without the quotes, obviously) and hit Option Escape and
get No Matches were found.
Is there something else I need to do to get this working?
Thanks,
John
A little command that's especially useful for writing emails.
It takes a highlighted URI and uses murl.info to shorten it to
something more like:
http://murl.info/14511
Very tinyurl but a little more underground ;-). Plus I couldn't get
tinyurl to do this...
It will accept a uri with or without a protocol (http(s)) and will
accept just about any amount of garbage on the end. It does a pretty
decent job of recognizing if what you have selected is actually a uri
or not.
Brett

Brett Terpstra : Art Director
Circle Six Design, Inc.
111 Riverfront Dr, Suite 204
..................................................
p: 507.459.4398
877.858.4332
f: 1.866.540.3063
e: brett(a)circlesixdesign.com
http://www.circlesixdesign.com
..................................................
On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> Could you btw make a case for the new Ruby syntax? I never figured
> out what problem it was supposed to solve.
The default Ruby syntax doesn't scope enough stuff.
There are very basic things that are completely missing like
method calls, operators and lambda variables.
My Ruby Experimental adds these basic things and a few other niceties
like leading space and core library method names and better
punctuation support.
The advantage is partly for the ability to better theme Ruby files,
which many people like myself are looking at all day every day.
Looking at mostly white on black text all day is enough to make you
go mad.
Another advantage is in using the Select Scope command to better and
more quickly select the current relevant scope.
When you don't know the language as well as you'd like, having the
core library methods colored slightly differently can really help you
to quickly notice any misspellings and such.
So, to sum up:
finish scoping the basic syntax of the language
different kinds of operators, methods, lambda variables, basic
punctuation like the => thing, etc…
core methods
Improved text interaction with select scope
improved readability with leading space scopes
improved awesomeness with the minimization of unscoped generic text
But, that's not really the point.
The point is that a syntax should scope as much as possible, not as
little as necessary.
Then it's up to each person to choose how you use those scopes.
Just take a bit of a peek for yourselves internet people!
Would you rather spend all day looking at this:
http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?
id=404629435&context=photostream&size=o
or this?
http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?
id=404629540&context=photostream&size=o
(if you hate that theme, just pretend you love it instead)
thomas Aylott — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg — sixteenColors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
would it be possible, to add folding markers for the =begin ... =end
documentation in ruby? It would be usefull, if I could hide large
documentation parts in a script.
Thanks in advance,
Simon
- ----
> privacy is necessary
> using http://gnupg.org
> public key id: 0x6115F804EFB33229 http://ruderich.com/
simonruderich.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFbE+cYRX4BO+zMikRCuQjAJ4nyg7vJVGgfILRNGspMScVw5B10wCbBfwf
Seck//9uFxjZzVv+IJXGRIg=
=4TGS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
