Hi !
Thanks all for your answers. So I will look again at TM when it reaches 1.3.
Just a few comments :
- I need some way to close XML tags automatically with the easyiest
possible keystroke. For some reason, the shortcut for this feature does not work on my system (Tiger on iBook G4 and latest version of TextMate)
command-alt-shift-; (on a French keyboard) does not work?Seems to me that on my old B&W G3 under Tiger it works regardless of the kind of document edited in TM.
I confirm that this does not work on my system. What's strange about that is that when I hit this keystroke, the "Automation" menu actually blinks, as if one of its items was activated, but nothing more happens. But when I select the item in the menu using the mouse, it works... As far as I remember I saw in another thread that this may be due to some kind of conflict with a LateX-related shortcut.
I have never used an editor that indented soft-wrapped lines. I would think that would be annoying because the editor would control the indentation, not you.
I'm talking about *soft* wrapping, so this is just a matter of display. For me this feature offers a very clear view of text- oriented XML documents (see screenshot attached).
Best regards, -- Frédérik Bilhaut GREYC - Université de Caen Campus II - Sciences 3 - Bureau 385 http://www.info.unicaen.fr/~fbilhaut
On 26/09/2005, at 17.14, Frédérik Bilhaut wrote:
I have never used an editor that indented soft-wrapped lines. I would think that would be annoying because the editor would control the indentation, not you.
I'm talking about *soft* wrapping, so this is just a matter of display.
I'm sure you both are, since you both call it soft wrapping :-p. I would like that feature too, but if it doesn't indent kinda like I would expect it to, it could end up being worse than no indentation.
-- Sune.
I'm sure you both are, since you both call it soft wrapping :-p. I would like that feature too, but if it doesn't indent kinda like I would expect it to, it could end up being worse than no indentation.
One could perhaps toggle it on and off in the preference pane? Actually, even though I'm pretty happy about most (if not all) functions in textmate ,I'd like some more togglers and sliders in the preferance pane. Rather than go into the different bundles and change for example that selected strings get ""'s around them and so, it would be nice with some checkbuttons for the less tech-savvy.
Andreas
On 27/09/2005, at 11.17, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
Actually, even though I'm pretty happy about most (if not all) functions in textmate ,I'd like some more togglers and sliders in the preferance pane. Rather than go into the different bundles and change for example that selected strings get ""'s around them and so, it would be nice with some checkbuttons for the less tech-savvy.
I do consider the current scope specific preferences system provisional.
Generally I don't like options, but when they're unavoidable, I definitely want them exposed through a GUI instead of text -- it's just that the current system is flexible in that I can change it easily w/o having to rethink the GUI, and it allows more “free form” preferences.
If people haven't noticed, evolutionary prototyping is my preferred development method :)
-
Allan Odgaard -
Andreas Wahlin -
Frédérik Bilhaut -
Sune Foldager