On 20 mai 05, at 03:53, Allan Odgaard wrote:
this is one of the reasons I keep these betas as unofficial, beacause these things are more work in progress than usual!
I just wonder if it's a good thing to have Beta 9 as the "official" download on MacUpdate with no explanation at all...
On May 20, 2005, at 4:13, Fred B. wrote:
this is one of the reasons I keep these betas as unofficial, beacause these things are more work in progress than usual!
I just wonder if it's a good thing to have Beta 9 as the "official" download on MacUpdate with no explanation at all...
I just returned and saw this myself. That's a VERY bad idea. I'm not sure why it got there (I did _not_ post it myself).
I have written the MacUpdate staff and asked why it got there.
On 20 mai 05, at 04:22, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On May 20, 2005, at 4:13, Fred B. wrote:
I just wonder if it's a good thing to have Beta 9 as the "official" download on MacUpdate with no explanation at all...
I just returned and saw this myself. That's a VERY bad idea. I'm not sure why it got there (I did _not_ post it myself).
I have written the MacUpdate staff and asked why it got there.
In case I didn't make myself clear, I knew you didn't post it yourself. Sorry for the weird way of writing this.
I know not all software on MU are posted by their authors, so they probably posted it themselves or some user asked them to. Bad idea anyway.
I just returned and saw this myself. That's a VERY bad idea. I'm not sure why it got there (I did _not_ post it myself).
I have written the MacUpdate staff and asked why it got there.
Don't expect to get very far, I've seen MU/VT ignore a devs wishes when it comes to what to posting pre-release files. They generally feel that having more posts is better than having them all working.
-
Allan Odgaard -
Fred B. -
Michael Sheets