26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
1:03 a.m.
On 26/1/2006, at 1:35, Matthias Damm wrote:
[...]
I am not sure if you can really compare beamer and koma here. Beamer has some syntax which is quite different from standard LaTeX. But koma is just a variant of LaTeX, it replaces the standard article, book etc. classes by scrartcl, scrbook etc. and gives you some more options. I don't think that koma support will hurt any standard LaTeX user.
Then we can probably add support for that in the standard LaTeX grammar, similar to how the C grammar markup miscellaneous Mac specific types (which are not in the C language/library per se).
Curious, what are the advantages of using koma? And do you have a link with more info?