On Tue, 8 Mar 19:01 (+0100), Allan Odgaard wrote:
With this scheme, ctrl-shift-S would be nice, although this is currently incremental search backwards. What does the users of incremental search say, do you ever search backwards, or can we move that key? :)
Argh, its backwards search. :/ I use this sometimes, maybe ctrl-shift-v would be an alternative, whats this ATM?